One great countries across the planet are now a total wreck because of mass illegal immigration. The future looks bleak!

 

The U.K. and Canada seem hellbent on their own assisted national suicide

What else can one conclude from some recent government actions?

Eric Utter | March 20, 2026 www.americanthinker.com

According to a PJ Media report, a British teacher lost his job and was banned "from teaching altogether after reasonably arguing against mass illegal migration to his country.”

Sam Everett, the teacher, had recently expressed his opinion on social media that the British Navy should be enlisted to stop the unending invasion of third-world migrant men coming to the U.K. in small boats.

Everett, a physical education teacher in Darlington, once also had the temerity to state that illegal aliens should “respect our laws or leave.”

What a radical! What kind of monster wants people to respect the laws of the land?

An independent panel was promptly assembled to investigate the crazed educator. The panel subsequently recommended that Everett be allowed to retain his job and found that he was not guilty of racism. Or any other kind of “ism” for that matter. Numerous colleagues praised his record.

But the U.K. government, with the intrepid Keir Starmer at the helm, would have none of it. Independent panels be damned, Britain’s Department for Education (DfE) eschewed the panel’s findings, ignored the evidence, and imposed a comprehensive ban on Everett that could prevent him from ever teaching again.

Meanwhile, in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, the Fairview School has banned all food in its cafeteria and lunchroom to respect Ramadan.

The U.K. -- and its similarly deranged dominion, Canada -- are off their respective rockers.

They have it in for themselves, bigly … to the point that they may well eventually become — even if inadvertently — a serious threat to the United States and the security and existence of the free world.

They are not only weak links as regards NATO, but appear to be actively seeking their own destruction, by inviting the Muslim world in and/or cottoning to communist China.

This will have to be addressed at some point if things don’t take a U-turn in the near future. Islam— and communism — are absolutely incompatible with a free, prosperous, democratic society or republic. It is one or the other.

This is terribly sad, and, in a sane world, would have been easily avoidable, but nonetheless here we are. Both the U.K. and Canada are far down a road that ought not have been travelled.

“Cartels to the south of us, morons to the north, here I am, stuck in the middle with you. ”

 

Illegal aliens continue to violate USA rules, laws and regulations. Even illegal alien juveniles could care less about their social actions.

 

Parents enraged over adult illegal alien allegedly molesting Virginia high school girls

Joseph MacKinnon March 18, 2026 theblaze.com

Parents accuse Fairfax High School of trying to downplay the incident.

Israel Flores-Ortiz, an illegal alien from El Salvador who stole into the U.S. in 2024 and was subsequently released by the Biden administration, is accused of molesting at least nine girls at Fairfax High School in Virginia where he was enrolled in the 11th grade, even though he is at least 18 years old.

Adding insult to injury, the school allegedly downplayed the scandal.

'They have attempted to sweep it under the rug.'

The alleged offenses took place as recently as Feb. 25. Flores-Ortiz was arrested on March 7 and has been charged with nine counts of assault and battery.

"There's a group of about 12 individuals that have reported this assault," a mother of one of the victims told WJLA-TV. "It was all perpetrated by a single individual who is a stranger to the girls. He just sneakily walked up behind them and put his hand in between their legs. It was not just a butt smack or a butt grab. It was a groping of a private area. It had been occurring for several months."

Two of the victims' mothers said that the school was doing a terrible job handling the situation.

"Abysmal, abysmal," said one of the mothers. "I think from the very beginning, Fairfax County has attempted to diminish what happened to these girls."

Fairfax High School principal Georgina Aye reportedly waited over two weeks after the incidents were reported to notify parents in an email, "We are writing to share the news of the recent arrest of a student who was charged with inappropriately touching other students at school. These incidents involved the student touching students’ buttocks while they were transitioning in the hallways."

RELATED: ICE arrests child-diddlers and ecstasy traffickers while Dems try to 'score brownie points,' DHS says

 

Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger (D). Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images.

Parents lashed out over Aye's claim that the alleged molestation was simply a matter of a "student touching students’ buttocks."

"Yeah, no, I would not be here for butt slapping," one mother told WJLA. "I would, I mean, I would be upset about that, but this wouldn't be my second day this week here at the courthouse for that. It was a clear violation. He put his hand in between my daughter's legs, and the butt was actually the last thing that he touched."

Another mother said, "The girls have experienced harassment and bullying from peers at school, including people that they once thought were their friends, and the letter that they sent out, referencing it only as buttocks touching, just adds fuel to rumors that they were just attention seeking."

"They have attempted to sweep it under the rug," said one mother.

The City of Fairfax School Board, which oversees Fairfax High School in partnership with the FCPS, said in a statement on Monday that it "takes the recent situation at Fairfax High School very seriously."

"We support the students who have been directly affected and encourage members of the Fairfax High School community to support one another during this difficult time. Inappropriate conduct has no place in our schools, and we understand the concern and distress this incident has caused for students and families," said the school board. "We also want to express our support for Principal Dr. Georgina Aye, a student-centered leader who has devoted her career to serving and supporting students. We have confidence in her leadership."

In addition to receiving what one victim's mother described as "a completely sanitized letter" from the school's purportedly "student-centered leader," parents were allegedly informed by Fairfax County Public Schools that upon his release, Flores-Ortiz would return to school.

FCPS told WJLA in a statement, "While Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS) is unable to comment on specifics due to federal and state privacy laws, we prioritize student and staff safety and we fully investigate any time someone shares that an incident has occurred at school, or that they do not feel safe at school."

FCPS did not respond to a request for comment from Blaze News.

ICE issued a detainer for Ortiz, the agency told WJLA, "to ensure this violent criminal is removed from our country so he can never claim another victim again."

Fairfax County Sheriff Stacey Kincaid's (D) office told Blaze News in a statement:

Israel Flores Ortiz remains in the custody of the Sheriff’s Office in the Fairfax County Adult Detention Center (ADC). While it is still too early in the process to know the outcome of his case, ICE has been notified of Ortiz’s location at the ADC, and they are able to execute their detainer by responding to the ADC and taking Ortiz into custody if and when he is ordered released.

The Fairfax County Sheriff’s Office does not obstruct or prevent ICE from acting on their civil detainers.

Flores-Ortiz reportedly requested to be released on bail. Fairfax County Commonwealth's Attorney Steve Descano's (D) office told Blaze News that there was a bond hearing, but "after listening to arguments, the judge decided to hold him. He is being held."

Judge Dipti Pidikiti-Smith reportedly denied Ortiz's request on Friday after reviewing surveillance video of one of the incidents.

"This 19-year-old criminal illegal alien should NOT have been attending a Virginia high school and allowed to prey on innocent teenage girls. He now faces nine counts of assault and battery. This is yet another example of the Biden administration’s failed open border policies," DHS Deputy Assistant Secretary Lauren Bis said in a statement.

"We are calling on Fairfax County sanctuary politicians to NOT release this predator from jail back into our communities to assault more teenage women," continued Bis. "Unfortunately, Governor Abigail Spanberger ended cooperation with ICE and is siding with criminal illegal aliens over American citizens."

 

It's amazing when the vote of a single person can determine government immigration policy. It happens quite often.

 

Appeals court rules Trump admin can continue quickly deporting illegal migrants to third countries

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit did not give a reason for the ruling but allowed the deportations to continue in a 2-1 decision.

By Misty Severi justthenews.com 3-16-26

A federal appeals court ruled Monday that the Trump administration can continue its swift deportation efforts of illegal migrants to third countries, overturning a lower court's ruling that the practice was illegal.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit did not give a reason for the ruling but allowed the deportations to continue in a 2-1 decision. The panel also expedited the schedule for the case’s next phase, according to The Hill.

Judge Lara Montecalvo, who was appointed by former President Joe Biden, dissented, while Judge Jeffrey Howard, nominated by former President George W. Bush, and Judge Seth Aframe, another Biden nominee, ruled in the majority.

The order comes after U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy directed the Trump administration last month to first try to remove migrants to the country they come from, and provide migrants with a “meaningful opportunity” to contest their deportation if they cannot return to their home country and once a third country is selected. 

The order is expected to be appealed to the Supreme Court.

 

Another important post on this national tragedy.

 

Senate confronts the question of birthright citizenship

Witnesses came in for and against. Who made the better case?

Wendi Strauch Mahoney | March 17, 2026 www.americanthinker.com

At the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution’s March 10 hearing, “Protecting American Citizenship: Birthright Citizenship for Illegal Aliens and Tourists,” senators and witnesses confronted the fundamental question of whether the Fourteenth Amendment’s citizenship clause has been stretched beyond its meaning.  Attorney Charles J. Cooper, Professor Ilan Wurman, and author and Government Accountability Institute president Peter Schweizer argued that current doctrine is too broad.  Professor Amanda Frost and Marine veteran Alejandro Barranco defended birthright citizenship as both constitutionally settled and central to the American civic tradition.

Cooper offered legal arguments for restriction, arguing that the phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” means “full and complete” jurisdiction, “requiring a permanent reciprocal political bond between the parents of the new citizen and the United States.”  He added that a “reciprocal bond” means “an enduring allegiance,” reserved for those “who have made this country their lawful and permanent home.”  It does not apply to children of parents who are here temporarily, even if they are lawful visitors to the United States.  As such, Cooper argued, it follows that children of illegal aliens “are excluded as well.”  He said that the framers of the Fourteenth Amendment modeled the citizenship clause after the Civil Rights Act of 1866, which he argued “unequivocally excluded from birthright citizenship children of aliens here temporarily and of aliens who have deliberately entered the country illegally.”

Wurman explained that the original common-law and Fourteenth Amendment understanding of birthright citizenship turned not on mere birthplace, but on whether the child’s parents were lawfully under the sovereign’s protection and thus subject to its full jurisdiction — an argument that would exclude at least the children of illegal aliens, and possibly some children of temporary visitors, from automatic citizenship at birth.

Frost argued that the Fourteenth Amendment’s citizenship clause guarantees birthright citizenship to nearly everyone born on U.S. soil, with only the traditional narrow exceptions for children of diplomats, enemy occupiers, and historically members of sovereign Indian tribes, and that this understanding is supported by the text, the 1866 debates, United States v. Wong Kim Ark, and more than a century of federal practice and case law.

She contended that President Trump’s Executive Order 14160 is an unconstitutional attempt to rewrite both the Constitution and 8 USC §1401(a) by denying citizenship to children born here to illegal aliens and many temporary lawful visitors, and she rejected the administration’s alternative theories based on “allegiance,” parental “domicile,” or federal “consent” as arguments unsupported by the citizenship clause’s actual language or history.  Frost also stated that the consequences of adopting the Trump administration’s policies “would be dire for all families in the U.S.”

Specifically, Frost predicted that if the executive order were to remain in effect, its consequences would be sweeping: roughly 250,000 children born each year to legal temporary immigrants and illegal aliens could be treated as noncitizens from birth and denied Social Security numbers, passports, and access to benefits, with some potentially rendered stateless and even subject to removal despite being newborns.  The disruption would not stop with those families, according to Frost.  Parents across the country, including green card holders and even U.S. citizens, could be forced to prove their own legal status at the time of a child’s birth before that child would be recognized as American, even though hospitals and state agencies are not set up to collect or verify that kind of complex immigration documentation.  In effect, Frost said, “the United States would have replaced the egalitarian rule that we are all American at birth with a test of lineage and ancestry — a legal rule at odds with our Constitution and antithetical to the nation’s founding values.”

Barranco brought a compelling and personal perspective to the hearing.  Born in the United States to Mexican immigrants, he proudly served in the Marines and was “taught to respect the flag, to be thankful for the opportunities this country gave me and to give back whenever I could.”  He told senators that birthright citizenship is what made it possible for him to attend school, graduate, enlist in the Marine Corps, and serve the country, and he argued that Americans are judged by allegiance and service, not by where their parents were born.  He also shared that he “raised three sons who all chose to serve as Marines.”

Schweizer’s testimony was arguably the most thought-provoking and timely because it shifted the hearing away from a purely legal dispute over the Fourteenth Amendment and recast birthright citizenship as a long-term national security and sovereignty issue, especially in relation to China.  According to Schweizer, birth tourism is being deliberately exploited by PRC nationals and CCP-linked elites who travel to U.S. soil so their children acquire automatic American citizenship.  Ranking member Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) challenged Schweizer’s claims, saying they were “ridiculous.”

Schweizer then cited estimates of 50,000 to 100,000 Chinese birth tourism cases annually and claimed that over time, this may have produced from roughly 750,000 to 1.5 million Chinese nationals with U.S. citizenship by birth.  Many of those children end up moving back to China while keeping their U.S. passports.  Schweizer explained,

These individuals grow up in China, often educated in CCP-controlled schools with distorted views of U.S. history, values, and culture. They have no lived connection or demonstrated allegiance to our country, yet they possess full rights as U.S. citizens: the ability to vote in elections, relocate here at will, and — upon turning 21 — sponsor their parents as permanent residents.

Schweizer also highlighted U.S.-based surrogacy arrangements involving Chinese clients and politically connected figures, arguing that Beijing tolerates or encourages these practices because they create strategic advantages, including future voting rights, residency options, and family-based immigration pathways.  Citing a “prominent example” of such surrogacy arrangements, Schweizer continued,

A prominent example emerged in May 2025, when authorities discovered 15 children, ages two months to 13 years, in an Arcadia, California, mansion owned by a Chinese businessman and CCP insider. He used his own company, Mark Surrogacy Investment LLC, to arrange surrogacies across multiple states. In total, 21 children were linked to him. The Wall Street Journal recently ran a story about another Chinese executive who is said to have over 100 children via surrogacy.

Schweizer added,

These cases highlight a largely unregulated surrogacy industry in states like California, where over 100 companies with “surrogacy” in their names are owned by Chinese individuals. IVF and surrogacy services for Chinese clients have even been tied to China’s Belt and Road Initiative.

Schweizer’s central point was that birth tourism and related surrogacy practices are not just immigration loopholes, but a potentially serious long-term national security threat that allows people with no lived connection or demonstrated allegiance to the United States to obtain the full benefits of American citizenship.  Sens. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) and Rick Scott (R-Fla.) urged Attorney General Pam Bondi in a Feb. 26 letter to investigate Chinese-owned surrogacy centers and related allegations involving exploitation of U.S. surrogacy and birthright citizenship laws.

Image: JSMed via Pixabay, Pixabay License.