DHS/ICE occupy the front lines of this national tragedy against the silent invasion of illegal alien invaders. They deserve our full undivided support!

 

Are Democrats tacitly encouraging assassination hits on ICE agents?

By Richard Blakley www.americanthinker.com

On the July 23, 2025 edition of the Fox News show, Greg Gutfeld, in speaking of the CBP agent that was shot in the face by an illegal alien, Gutfeld said, “And you know Tyrus, when this story came out about this agent getting shot, the media wouldn’t say he [the shooter] is an illegal suspect.  They wouldn’t say anything about him.  Said an agent was shot on a rock in Central Park.”

In response, Tyrus said,

I have a problem with this, and maybe this is just… I don’t believe in coincidences, and there has been a concentrated effort to ‘out’ ICE agents.  And for two men... grown a** men to get on a scooter to go riding in a park with guns, to go rob?  That doesn’t make much sense to me.  But two guys looking to make a ‘hit’ on somebody that makes sense to me.  So, just how random is that?  How many millions of people do we have in New York just walking around, and these two illegals just happen to stumble upon a guy, who just happens to be an off-duty officer?  Bullsh**!  It’s a ‘hit’ in my opinion and we are lucky he was able to get through it.  And I would like to see the same vigor from our so-called government investigations that are dealing with this Epstein bullsh** and whatever Barack Obama did ten years ago.  I don’t give a d*** about any of that.  That is not a table issue for me and my family.  Right now, my table issue is our police officers, and our border agents are under attack.  We have senators or congressmen who are demanding they [officers] take their masks off so they can see their face, so they can expose their family.  So, I don’t see we meant well at all.  There’s that old saying, ‘The road to hell is paved with good intentions.’ Well, we need to start sending some of these people to hell.

Rep. Eric Swalwell, (D-CA), infamous for having an affair with a Chinese spy, accused ICE immigration enforcement officers of behaving like “bank robbers.” He stated, “I hope every state that is able to, and every community that is able to, unmasks ICE with their policies.  If you’re standing on the law, you can show your face.”

Unfortunately, Swalwell had not considered that masks are needed for safety.  Tom Homan defended the use of masks by agents stating, “The attacks on ICE is unprecedented, 700% increased.  And we are not even talking about the doxing of agents, their spouses and their children.”  Apparently, subversives are doxing ICE agents’ private information.

After a successful ICE raid in San Diego, CA, local city councilman, Sean Elo-Rivera posted on Instagram that ICE agents are “terrorists” and after criticism, stood by his comments.  In response, acting head of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Todd Lyons stated, “I’m sorry if people are offended by them wearing masks.  I’m not going to let my officers and agents go out there and put their lives on the line, their family on the line because people don’t like what immigration enforcement is.”  Then he asked, “Is that the issue here that we’re just upset about the masks?  Or is anyone upset about the fact that ICE officers’ families were labeled terrorists?”

Illinois lawmakers are pushing to unmask ICE.  California lawmakers are pushing to unmask ICE.  Massachusetts lawmakers are pushing to unmask ICE.  New York lawmakers are pushing to unmask ICE.  Michigan lawmakers are calling for ICE agents wearing masks to be jailed.  Democrats on Capitol Hill introduced legislation to require officers to identify themselves without masks.

House Speaker Mike Johnson stated that the Democrats who are pushing for ICE agents to unmask are the same “people who mandated mask wearing for years in America” during the COVID era.

Johnson stated that Democrats like House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries say that ICE agents should not be wearing masks as they arrest these illegal migrants.  Johnson stated,

From the people who mandated mask wearing for years in America.  It’s absurd.  They need to back off ICE and respect our agents and stop protesting them.  [The agents are] …trying to uphold the rule of law, and they don’t want to be targeted by Democrat activists.

In speaking of unmasking agents, Johnson continued and said, “Why?  So that they can target them?  So they can put their names and faces online and dox them?  That’s what these activists do.  So we have to protect those who protect our communities.”

In response to Democrat lawmakers on Capitol Hill trying to pass their unmasking legislation, President Trump stated,

Well, they would not be saying that if they didn’t hate our country.  And obviously, they do.

These officers are doing a tremendous job.  They’re great patriots.  If you expose them because of, you know, statements that have been made by Democrats and others on the left, usually mostly, I think, probably exclusively, you put them in great danger, tremendous danger.

And it’s sort of funny when people picket in front of Columbia, in front of Harvard and they have masks on more than masks.  I mean you can’t see anything.  Nobody complains about that.  But when a patriot who works for ICE or Border Patrol puts a mask on so that they won’t recognize him and his family, so they can lead a little bit of a normal life after having worked so hard and so dangerously, there’s a problem with that.

This is the problem with Democrats, they have a lot of bad things going on in their heads.  They’ve become very…they’ve lost their confidence, number one.  And they’re really, they’ve become somewhat deranged.  I want to do whatever necessary to protect our great law enforcement people.  And they are right at the top of the list.

So, with Democrat lawmakers demanding the unmasking of ICE and Border Patrol agents, are they tacitly encouraging criminal activity against our government’s law enforcement agents and their families?

This past six months has seen a complete turn-around to the fraudulent Biden administration.

 

Trump's DOJ sets all-time record in prosecutions of illegal aliens — a stunning reversal from Biden's open-border era

Paul Sacca July 30, 2025 theblaze.com

Thousands of illegal immigrants face felony charges for illegal re-entry after prior deportation.

Through sweeping crackdowns, President Donald Trump's Department of Justice has reportedly set an all-time record in prosecutions of illegal immigrants — a stunning reversal from the open-border era of former President Joe Biden.

According to a new report, Trump's Justice Department had a record-breaking month for criminal prosecution of illegal aliens in June — notching more than 3,000 cases last month.

'If you're coming here illegally to live and work, being in a federal penitentiary for two years isn't going to allow you to do that.'

The Washington Times reported that Trump's DOJ set a record by filing more than 3,000 illegal re-entry cases in June alone — targeting illegal aliens who were deported but were caught when they attempted to sneak back across the border anyway.

Also in June, DOJ prosecutors filed 3,200 cases for simple illegal entry — while not a record high, the number was significant. The figure made up over 50% of all Border Patrol arrests last month, setting a record for prosecution rates. The Trump DOJ numbers are staggering compared to the Biden administration's open-border era, when prosecution rates never hit 1%.

Citing Justice Department data, the Austin American-Statesman reported that federal prosecutors filed 7,660 illegal re-entry cases during the first three months of this year, compared to 4,312 cases filed during the first three months of 2024 and 3,670 during the first three months of 2023.

The U.S. Department of Justice said that it is "using all available investigative and prosecutorial tools" to fight the "invasion of illegal immigration."

RELATED: 'Despicable': DHS unloads on left-leaning outlet for suggesting illegal alien pedophiles had a 'cultural misunderstanding'

 Jonathan Fahey — former assistant U.S. attorney in Virginia and the acting director at U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement in President Trump’s first term — told the Washington Times that these cases have a very high rate of conviction.

"They're a great way to get a conviction, a great way to get a criminal off the street, and a great way to remove them from the country in an expeditious way," Fahey explained.

Andrew "Art" Arthur — a former immigration judge — told the Washington Times, "If I get deported, I get deported. I go back and try again. But when it comes to prosecutions, now you've got a federal conviction. ... If you're coming here illegally to live and work, being in a federal penitentiary for two years isn't going to allow you to do that."

'President Trump has created the most secure border in the history of the nation, and the data proves it.'

RELATED: ICE deports illegal immigrant wanted for human smuggling that led to the deaths of 3 minors

The crackdown on illegal immigration has had a profound effect on encounters with illegal aliens.

Earlier this month, the White House noted that U.S. Border Patrol encountered 6,070 illegal immigrants at the southern border in June — a record-setting low that is 15% lower than the previous record set in March.

Tom Homan — Trump's border czar — said earlier this month, "As a matter of fact, the total number of encounters is less than half of a single day under Biden on many days. Also, none of the 6,070 were released into the U.S. ZERO."

"President Trump has created the most secure border in the history of the nation, and the data proves it," Homan declared. "We have never seen numbers this low. Never."

The White House proclaimed, "The number of 'gotaways' — illegal immigrants who escaped into the country undetected — was 90% lower compared to the same month last year."

The White House estimates that this fiscal year is "on track to see the fewest illegal immigrant encounters in five decades."

 

Many nations across the planet are suffering the horrific consequences of 'national culture destruction' because of unfettered immigration; including the USA!

 

The perils of allowing unlimited immigration for people with fundamentally un-American values

By Eleanor Dashwood www.americanthinker.com

The jury is currently deliberating in the Washington state murder trial against Ihsan and Zahraa Ali, who are accused of trying to murder their daughter. It’s not getting a lot of coverage, but it should because of the insight into a culture our immigration policy currently welcomes in.

According to witness testimony during the trial, in October 2024, the burly Ihsan Ali, his wife, Zahraa, intercepted another daughter, Fatima, outside of her high school. In full view of other students, including Fatima’s boyfriend, who was standing next to her, Ihsan grabbed Fatima, punched her boyfriend in the face as he tried to rescue her, put her into a chokehold from behind, pulled her to the ground, and tightened his grip.

Public domain images.

Several witnesses, many of whom tried to intervene, testified that Fatima’s face turned purple and her eyes rolled to the back of her head until she lost consciousness. Ihsan let go only when an adult male (ex-military) drove by, saw what was happening, and rescued Fatima, holding Ihsan until the police arrived.

Witnesses also testified that, once Ihsan was restrained, Zahraa tried to grab Fatima, scream loudly that she and her other daughter (who was present) had been abused by police (something witnesses denied), and worried about her arrested husband.

Meanwhile, Fatima and her boyfriend managed to get themselves into the school and were secured in the main office. School staff described her as staggering, her voice raspy, and that she had a terrified look on her face. Her mother ran into the school demanding her daughter back. She did so despite having been banned from campus a month prior for attempting to grab Fatima’s boyfriend.

According to the defense, the entire scenario was the reasonable care and parental discipline of a wayward daughter.

That was what happened in court.

However, there is a backstory that the judge ruled was inappropriate for the jury because it could trigger cultural biases. Seventeen-year-old Fatima was about to be sent on a one-way trip to Iraq, her parents’ homeland, where she was about to be forced into marriage with a much older man (50s or 60s). When Fatima went to school that day, she was trying to avoid being sent to Iraq and a life as a bride slave to a stranger.

The judge refused to allow the jury to hear this backstory or even the term honor killing. Fatima, in her own testimony, said her parents were not affectionate with her, and there were no hugs.

Contrary to the defense, Ishan’s and Zahraa’s behavior was not a display of parental caring. These were two parents ready and determined to murder their daughter for what they perceived as disobedience. She had an American boyfriend, and she didn’t want to submit to an arranged marriage in Iraq. For that, they fully believed it was their right to murder her to protect the family’s honor.

As the parents sit in court, mom covered forehead to toe in a shapeless garment, dad in Western clothes, both expressionless and dead-eyed, betraying no emotion except perhaps a low-boil anger, I can’t help but wonder if some of their contempt is for American jurisprudence. After all, in a Sharia court, they would not have been convicted, and Fatima would never be seen again. Here, they must endure the indignities of a female judge and two female prosecutors denying them, in their opinion, the right to murder a disobedient girl to preserve family honor. Fatima, by testifying, is dishonoring them further.

This case juxtaposes Sharia law with American law. Therefore, the parents must receive the most severe punishment possible to make it clear that Sharia law will not be tolerated here.

Beyond that, however, this case is an indictment of our immigration policy.

We Americans must ask ourselves, why did we let the Ali family move here in the first place? Why did we permit and even welcome people with their worldview to live here? They have contempt for everything this country stands for. They bring harm to us as a nation.

We see it everywhere, in Maine, in Minneapolis, in New York City, on college campuses, in the hatred and the pro-Hamas demonstrations. The Sharia mentality is harming our country. Why the hell are they here?

Why do we import people who think that daughter murder, infidel murder, spousal abuse, hatred of the West, love of intifada, and hatred and contempt for Christians and Jews are divinely ordained?

And beyond that question, now that they are here, from the Alis, to Mahmoud Khalil, to immigration fraudster Ilhan Omar, how can we repatriate them to the lands more consistent with their values and dearer to their hearts as soon as possible? What lessons as a society must we learn from Washington vs. Ali? And whatever we learn, we’d better learn fast.