Friday, April 3, 2026

A 'divided nation' cannot stand. This article verifies that statement.

 


For Dems, illegal aliens are more valuable than you are

Once, immigration was intended to benefit America and Americans. Today, for Democrats, the only benefit allowed is for the immigrants, especially the illegal ones. 

Andrea Widburg | March 29, 2026 www.americanthinker.com

One of the most useful aspects of the Trump presidency is that Democrats are no longer hiding their cards. Whether because Trump has driven them mad or because they truly believe Trump is the last gasp of Americanism and that they are on the verge of total control (there’s a scary thought), they’re being very open about their goals.

Currently, their overriding goal is to replace the American population, which is too white and too independent for their tastes. This project started in the 1960s, with Teddy Kennedy’s bill ending immigration based on quotas that favored immigrants from countries with values similar to America’s and who could vouch (or have someone vouch on their behalf) that they would not become a burden to the American taxpayer.

Instead, the new goals were family reunification and workers with needed skills. The former goal quickly outstripped the latter.

That change to the law reshaped America’s demographics. Suddenly, immigrants poured in from Latin America, Asia, Africa, India, and other regions. In the early days, most of these immigrants assimilated because assimilation was still part of the American educational and institutional ethos.

However, as Democrats reclassified assimilation as racism, and our education systems from kindergarten to graduate school taught that America is an evil nation, subsequent generations of illegal immigrants and their children not only did not assimilate but became actively hostile to their new home. You could say that Ilhan Omar is Exhibit A for this mindset.

Moreover, while many immigrant parents may still have been alive to the wonders of America compared to the third world, often totalitarian nations they fled, their children, products of leftist education, had nothing but disdain for this country. This was the case for the people I grew up with. The parents appreciated America. Their children (my former classmates), all of whom graduated from college, do not. As many proudly post on Facebook, they’ve been out on the streets screaming about “No Kings,” “Abolish ICE,” and “Reparations.”

The shift was about more than numbers and demographics. It was also about the answer to that famous Latin question: “Cui bono?” (Who benefits?) Is it America or the immigrants?

After the Civil War, as America was becoming an industrial powerhouse, Congress began passing immigration laws. Some were openly racist in nature, with the most obvious example being the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, which explicitly targeted Chinese immigrants. Others, as noted, were intended to benefit European immigrants over others. Most importantly, though, the immigration laws were intended to keep America safe. That is why they used places like Ellis Island to try to keep out people with dangerous infectious diseases. 

The laws’ goals were also to benefit America, not just by keeping out what were then believed to be bad apples, but by bringing in something America, with its exploding industrial base, desperately needed: Labor. It didn’t have to be skilled labor. It just needed muscle to run the factories and build the infrastructure for a country growing both internally and through immigration. Congress also needed more farmers, because more people made more food a necessity.

The whole system was highly symbiotic: economic growth required labor, which in turn spurred further growth, etc. One thing, though, was always clear: This wasn’t meant to benefit the immigrants, no matter what was written on the Statue of Liberty. It was meant to benefit America.

Up until the 1960s, everyone understood that assimilation benefited America. The Melting Pot was the thing. Embrace American values, and you will be an American. You can be proud of your heritage, but the melting pot is what counts. (Even Hollywood got in on the act.) And it really was a melting pot when you had Jimmy Cagney showing off his Yiddish (which he spoke fluently).

It’s different now. Democrats are done with Americans—and, more than that, they’re not bothering to hide it anymore. As far as they’re concerned, immigration isn’t about making our country better, stronger, wealthier, and safer.

And we certainly don’t need the muscle, thanks to Democrat and Chamber of Commerce policies that saw so much of our industrial base go to the same countries from which the illegal immigrants now come. Instead, for Democrats, immigration is solely about making life better for illegal aliens, and ensuring that as many come as possible, regardless of their ability to work and stay off of welfare. The salt in the wound is that those who do work, by accepting much lower wages, take jobs from Americans.

Nor is the new immigrants’ criminal or disease status a matter of concern. The man accused of killing Sheridan Gorman is here illegally, was a criminal, has tuberculosis, might have killed her as a gang initiation, and is either completely illiterate or, arguably, mentally retarded—but Loyola University, Gorman’s school, apologized for calling him an illegal immigrant.

Please note, too, that this is no longer about helping people escape from genocide. It’s just about getting them out of their economically backward, often crime-ridden countries, so they can bring those values here.

And again, Democrats are not apologetic; they’re proud. A couple of years ago, Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CN) explained that the people whom Democrats care most about are illegal aliens:

(X Link)

A couple of days ago, Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-WA), herself an immigrant from India, stated plainly that she wants illegal aliens given reparations for the trauma of ICE enforcement:

(X-Link)

And of course, the Democrats have been blowing apart American security in a time of war, and making air travel a nightmare, for one purpose only: to make it impossible for ICE to deport illegal aliens.

The useful idiots are all on board with this. They hate America and dream of a nation that has the distinct vibe of the worst parts of the third world (maybe Haiti) combined with downtown San Francisco, Los Angeles, or Chicago. But the rest of America had better wise up and vote Republican, or else the Democrats’ dream will become all of our nightmares.

 

Thursday, April 2, 2026

The composer of this post provides a positive expression of supporting DHS/ICE!

 


Why I support ICE as the son of an immigrant

William Holmes April 01, 2026 theblaze.com

I was taught to be thankful for what America offered me. One of those things is a firm rule of law.

You’re the son of an immigrant. How could you support ICE?

Someone recently asked me this question. This same person also felt that I should be supporting the No Kings protest. It showed me how effective the Democratic Party has been at framing these issues to Democrats' advantage.

It is naïve to think that those who are willing to skip the process to come here illegally will automatically follow the laws once they arrive.

I lovingly and jokingly say my mother is a fresh-off-the-boat immigrant. She met my father in the Philippines during the Vietnam War. They fell in love and got married in the United States.

She grew up in abject poverty and had an idealistic view of the United States while growing up. Her country, the Philippines, was liberated by the United States twice: once in the late 1800s from Spanish colonial rule, and again during World War II from imperial Japanese rule.

She has more pride in being American than almost any other American I know.

She understands that the United States offers more than any other country in the world. It is something that the children and grandchildren of immigrants often forget. Thankfully, her children didn’t. She supports ICE and President Trump, and I think I can explain why.

For legal immigrants, the rule of law is incredibly important. Many of them come here for the simple reason that the rule of law in their countries broke down. Money misspent, officials and law enforcement taking open bribes, and government tyranny are some of the many reasons an immigrant would decide to come here.

Others in her family followed my mother’s journey, but they followed the legal process. Some had to wait years before coming. To them, seeing someone skip the process, skip the interviews, and skip the sponsorship requirements to come here while others they know are still patiently waiting is an insult.

ICE prioritizes removing convicted criminals, gang members, and repeat offenders. This is common-sense protection for our communities and families. It is naïve to think that those who are willing to skip the process to come here illegally will automatically follow the laws once they arrive.

Not everyone in the world likes us. Some openly call for our death and destruction. Some are motivated to hate by their religion, some by strict adherence to an economic or social ideology.

Immigrants can understand the importance of examining those who wish to live here, for those may bring the evils they hoped to escape.

Illegal immigration places downward pressure on wages. Many legal immigrants take jobs in sectors such as construction, hospitality, and caregiving. Enforcement of immigration laws helps those who came here legally and comply with our laws to earn a fair wage.

What about the costs of housing and health? If you know the basic economics of supply and demand, you understand the negative impact illegal immigration can have.

Legal immigrants also understand that illegal immigration brings bad actors who can negatively taint the positives of immigration and turn a populace against those who followed our process.

RELATED: Memo to Trump: Stop negotiating and ramp up deportations

 Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images

Unfortunately, failing to enforce immigration laws leads to the bias of lumping all immigrants in the illegal category. Recent immigrants value the long-term viability of the American dream. Many feel a duty to support the laws that made their success possible. For them, supporting ICE is a natural and easy thing to do.

For the same reasons, supporting the No Kings protests is silly. Let’s start with the obvious: We don’t live under a king, and Trump was democratically elected. The executive branch is constitutional, and checks and balances still exist. Even though an immigrant and the son of an immigrant may disagree with these No Kings protests, we understand that people are allowed to protest, and the fact that protests are allowed is incredibly important. We did not see anyone stopping them from speaking out or deplatforming them on social media.

Perhaps we should be unhappy with the president’s foreign policy decisions? I think I’ll defer to the majority of the Venezuelans and Iranians living here. I can also not overlook the checkered and violent tyrannical past of a theocratic government that openly chants “Death to America.”

The United State has elections, and these protesters might be surprised at the results. Their protests reminded many immigrants of the importance of voting.

 


Wednesday, April 1, 2026

The 'citizens' of this once great Republic have been paying the cost of billions for the illegal alien invasion, for over half a century. It's insanity!

 


The Economic Cost Of Open Borders

This article won’t stifle the immigration debate, it’ll simply lay out the tab.

Casey Harward | April 1, 2026 www.americanthinker.com

Immigration is one of America’s most contentious conversations. This post won’t stifle that conversation, it’ll simply lay out the tab.

Americans are starting to realize that accounting for rapidly shifting demographics is more uncomfortable than most expected. The numbers are large, and even more distressing when you consider the scale of the population shift underway.

The Scope of the Problem

There are approximately 14 million illegal aliens currently living in the United States, a record high. According to the Pew Research Center, that’s up 2.2 million from 11.8 million in 2022. The broader foreign-born population increased by 6.5 million over just 36 months (January 2021 to March 2024), rising from 45 million to 51.6 million. Foreigners now make up approximately 15.6% of the U.S. population, a proportion comparable only to 1890, when 14.8% of the population was foreign-born.

Systems, schools, emergency rooms, housing markets, and municipal budgets  process people at a certain speed. When growth outpaces capacity, the real costs aren’t simply multiples of the original investment. They become exponential.

The Federal Fiscal Burden: $150.7 Billion and Counting

A study by the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) finds that illegal immigration costs American taxpayers $182 billion annually before offsetting taxes paid by these individuals. After applying that offset, the net loss is $150.7 billion per year. This represents roughly a $35 billion increase from FAIR’s 2017 estimate of $116 billion, driven by population growth and expanded state benefit programs. Broken down, that’s $957 per taxpayer per year, and approximately $8,776 per illegal alien (or U.S.-born child thereof) annually.

(An honest disclaimer: The Cato Institute challenges FAIR’s methodology, arguing it incorrectly double-counts unauthorized immigrants and their citizen children. Cato estimates net costs in the range of $3.3 billion to $15.6 billion per year, a significant departure. FAIR’s figures are the most widely cited and serve as the baseline here, but this debate deserves acknowledgment.)

At the federal level, 2023 spending totaled $66.4 billion, including $23 billion on medical services and $11.6 billion on welfare programs such as food stamps, child nutrition, and Supplemental Security Income.

State and Local Governments: The Hardest Hit

While federal figures grab headlines, state and local governments bear the sharpest pain. A Congressional Budget Office report on the 2023 migrant surge found that while revenue from the influx increased by $10.1 billion, spending rose by $19.3 billion, a net loss of over $9 billion. The three primary cost drivers were K–12 education, emergency shelter, and border security.

California spends $21.76 billion annually to absorb the consequences of illegal immigration. Texas spends $8.88 billion. Former New York City mayor Eric Adams, a Democrat, stated he needed $2.8 billion for a single fiscal year to handle the influx amounting to $65,116 per migrant.

Illinois offers a cautionary tale in unintended consequences. In 2020, the state expanded Medicaid to cover illegal immigrants. Program administrators projected $223 million in 2023 expenses. By 2024, spending was projected at $1 billion. After trimming the program, final costs came in at $550 million,  still 90 percent over the original projection.

The Wages American Workers Never Received

There is another cost that never appears on a government balance sheet but it’s very real, and the people absorbing it are those who can least afford to.

When labor supply increases without a corresponding increase in demand, wages for native workers fall. It isn’t politics, it’s economics. Research from the Center for Immigration Studies found that for every one percent increase in the foreign-born share of an occupation, native-born workers see a 0.5 percent decrease in weekly wages. The heaviest losses are concentrated in construction, food services, maintenance, janitorial work, and agriculture, exactly where illegal immigrants and low-skilled native-born workers compete for the same jobs.

A national skill-cell methodology review found that a 10 percent increase in immigrants within a given education and experience group leads to a 3 to 4 percent reduction in wages for workers in that group. Workers without a high school diploma feel this most acutely.

The Heritage Foundation estimated wage impacts for this group ranging from 0.4 percent to as high as 7.4 percent. The range is wide, but the direction is not in question. The blue-collar workers, working poor, and minority Americans most likely to face competition from illegal immigrants are the very people who can least afford further wage suppression.

This is not new information. The Commission on Immigration Reform, chaired by Democrat Congresswoman Barbara Jordan with then-Governor Bill Clinton on the Advisory Board concluded in 1995: “The commission finds no national interest in continuing to import lesser-skilled and unskilled workers to compete in the most vulnerable parts of our labor force.” The outlook is no rosier today.

The Lifetime Fiscal Drain

Annual figures are alarming enough. Projected over a lifetime, they become sobering.

Economist Daniel Di Martino of the Manhattan Institute modeled the lifetime fiscal impact of newly arrived illegal immigrants  taxes paid versus government benefits received. The result: a $130,000 net fiscal burden per new illegal immigrant on average. For someone who arrives between the ages of 18 and 24 without a high school diploma  describing a large share of illegal entrants  that number climbs to $332,000 in lifetime taxpayer-funded benefits.

Scaled to the full population in question, the lifetime cost of the current immigration situation could reach $1.15 trillion  roughly $3,000 per U.S. citizen, from this one phenomenon alone.

What the Numbers Actually Show

Advocates of open borders often cite GDP. The Congressional Budget Office projected that immigration would add $8.9 trillion to GDP over 2024–2034. That’s a real number. But as National Affairs noted, a high-GDP country isn’t automatically a high-standard-of-living country. India has a larger economy than Sweden, but that doesn’t translate to quality of life. What does translate is output per person, wages that cover rising housing costs, emergency room wait times, whether the local school has room for every student.

In those terms, the numbers tell a different story:

  • A net annual taxpayer burden of $150.7 billion
  • More than $9 billion stripped from state and local budgets in a single year
  • Documented downward wage pressure on construction workers, warehouse workers, home health aides  the people who most need a raise
  • A lifetime fiscal exposure exceeding $1 trillion

These aren’t slogans dressed as statistics. Taken together, they don’t make a case for open borders. They make a strong case that the country has been quietly paying a very large bill that most people have never seen.