Tuesday, May 26, 2026

The evil corrupt illegal immigration fiasco goes round and round! Judges and Lawyers are having a 'hay day'.

 

DOJ vows to appeal after judge dismisses smuggling charges against Kilmar Abrego Garcia as 'vindictive'

DOJ spokesperson calls ruling 'wrong and dangerous' after judge found prosecution was retaliation for civil lawsuit

By Alexandra Koch , Bill Mears , David Spunt Fox News 5-22-26

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) vowed to appeal a federal judge's decision Friday to dismiss human smuggling charges against Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who initially entered the U.S. illegally and allegedly had suspected ties to MS-13, slamming the ruling as "wrong and dangerous."

U.S. District Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw Jr. on Friday threw out a two-count indictment in Tennessee against Abrego Garcia, ruling the DOJ's actions amounted to "vindictive and selective prosecution" in violation of the Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause.

Abrego Garcia was facing charges after allegedly conspiring to smuggle roughly 600 illegal immigrants into the U.S. annually, between 2016 and 2025, according to a cooperating witness.

"Another activist judge has placed politics above public safety," a DOJ spokesperson told Fox News. "The judge’s order is wrong and dangerous, and we will appeal."

The federal investigation was initially sparked by a November 2022 traffic stop in Tennessee and included suspected ties to the MS-13 gang and human trafficking.

The case became a constitutional standoff after the executive branch deported Abrego Garcia to El Salvador in March 2025 due to an alleged "administrative error."

Abrego Garcia sued the government, and the judicial branch — ultimately backed by the Supreme Court — unanimously ordered his return be "facilitate[d]" to the U.S.

Crenshaw, an Obama appointee, noted that just days after the Supreme Court's ruling, the Department of Homeland Security suddenly reopened a closed investigation into Abrego Garcia's 2022 traffic stop.

Top Justice Department officials, under the leadership of Attorney General Pam Bondi and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, then pushed for an indictment, according to court documents.

In his 32-page memorandum opinion, Crenshaw determined the DOJ's rapid pivot from closing the case to prosecuting Abrego Garcia was a direct retaliation for his successful civil lawsuit.

 


Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., meets with Kilmar Abrego Garcia at an undisclosed location in San Salvador, El Salvador, on April 17, 2025. (Sen. Van Hollen's Office/Getty Images, File)

Calling it an "abuse of prosecuting power," the judge concluded "absent Abrego’s successful lawsuit challenging his removal to El Salvador, the Government would not have brought this prosecution."

As a result of the finding, Crenshaw formally dismissed the indictment and vacated Abrego Garcia's conditions of release.

Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., who flew to El Salvador in April 2025 to meet with Abrego Garcia after he was deported to the country's "Terrorism Confinement Center" (CECOT) megaprison, hailed Friday's decision.

"Today, a federal judge made clear what we have long known: the Department of Justice was engaged in a vindictive prosecution against Kilmar Abrego Garcia," Van Hollen said in a statment. "This decision is a strong repudiation of Trump’s lawless DOJ and a win for the Constitutional rights of everyone in our nation."

 

Sunday, May 24, 2026

"As individual responsibility for crimes and bad behaviors continues to be diluted and diminished in our society, we can expect a rise in antisocial behavior and crime".

 


Illegal Is Legal, Immoral Is Moral

The moral norm in American society has shifted, and not for the better.

E. Jeffrey Ludwig | May 24, 2026 www.americanthinker.com

The moral norm in American society has shifted during the years from 1910 to the present, but especially during the past 50 years.  The link between being a “good citizen” and a “moral person” has atrophied, and we find ourselves in a decline, where so-called “good citizens” are regularly engaged in behaviors that in earlier decades were considered immoral or illegal.  Bad behavior is now “not so bad,” and crimes are often believed to be merely “adjustment problems.”  This shift in cultural values and norms has divided the population to the point where the more moral people tend to be older and deem younger generations less than moral.

On this writer’s block, there are two houses that have LGBTQ flags on poles in their yards.  Another “gay” couple has the flag outside in June, the official month for “appreciation” of those relationships.  The flag announces for all to see the victory of Obergefell v. Hodges in 2015, where the SCOTUS legitimized homosexual “marriage” nationwide as constitutional.  The Court reached this decision even though plebiscites by 30 states had previously voted against attempting to redefine marriage — even including California, on two occasions.

A young man who lives on my block is in his twenties and conversed with me the other day while smoking a joint that was as big as a small blunt.  His eyes were glazed and his expression tired, which he attributed to the “joint.”  At the same time, he was sociable and even engaging as he related a recent video production where he had been employed.  For him, being high and having a conversation with a neighbor was a completely normal activity.  The thought that anyone might question his stability or goodness as a person would never cross his mind.

Prostitution has been largely decriminalized in New York City, in particular in the boroughs of Manhattan and Brooklyn.  In Queens, there are Human Trafficking Intervention Courts, which were established more than 20 years ago in 2004 to “[treat] women arrested for prostitution as victims rather than criminals.”  The fact that worship of Ashteroth in the Holy Bible, involving prostitution invading the premises of worship in the temples, was repudiated by God does not even come into play when evaluating our laws.

We also are contending with millions of foreign nationals who were admitted illegally during President Joe Biden’s administration, whom Democrats defend against being rounded up and deported.  This expulsion of illegals is an affirmation of our legal system, which has set up rules for legal entry into the USA.  The rules were approved by our legislative system, but now and for the four years of the previous administration, those laws are being denied and repudiated by one of our two major parties.  The Democrats are doing what they can to defund the offices of government responsible for rounding up those illegals.  They are encouraging illegal behavior yet do not believe that a stigma is attached to that intention.

They are sentimentalizing immigration laws as though our already generous laws were overly strict and against the pro-immigration traditions of the USA.  Illegal entry by “huddled masses yearning to breathe free” is being propagandized as being more “moral” than obedience to the legitimately passed laws.

Also, our society has gone from a country honoring Ben Franklin’s saying, “neither a borrower nor a lender be,” to a society that is itself deeply in debt to the tune of trillions of dollars.  We are drowning in a credit-based marketplace where not only the government, but individuals and families are deeply in debt.  There are many companies that exist to negotiate “deals” for those debtors to reduce their obligations.  It seems incredible for our debt-ridden society to think there were prisons for debtors in England as recently as the 19th century.  In today’s world, if someone is drowning in debt, he will surely justify himself with the thought “that does not make me a bad person.”

A pastor friend of mine invited my wife and me to a service celebrating the second anniversary of a church he had established in Brooklyn, N.Y.  As part of the service, the youth choir made up of teenagers came forward to sing.  I was amazed to see one of the singers.  He was a student in one of my high school social studies classes, who was absent (cutting!) most school days.

The following Monday, he showed up for class.  I told him I was in the congregation when he was singing at the event on Friday night, and I asked him, “Are you a Christian?”  He nodded.  And I asked him, “Why are you absent most days from this class?”  He said nothing and then took his seat toward the rear of the room.  He continued throughout the lesson talking and laughing with two or three of his friends.  This was standard behavior for small groups in all classes at that chaotic high school.

He continued being truant most days and failed the class.  His conscience as a Christian was dead to the fact that he was in defiance of his obligation to himself, his family, and society by this lack of cooperation.

About a year and a half later, I learned that he had had an argument with someone in front of his apartment house who he thought was trying to steal his bike.  The person he was arguing with killed him.  I remembered his hardworking mother crying at one parent-teacher meeting as she spoke with me, and saying through her tears, “I don’t want my son to end up spending years behind bars!”

As he was dying, he named the one who stabbed him and was praying constantly. 

We also see increasing numbers of cases in the news of innocent victims, like Iryna Zarutska in North Carolina.  She was on a commuter train going home from work when suddenly she was stabbed to death by a maniac.  He was a felon with dozens of convictions who had been set free because he was perceived by various courts, social workers, and citizens as one of the victims of our “system” and not merely as a “victimizer” or “criminal.”  He is one of many whose crimes are diminished by various psychological and sociological premises.  Because they were poor or neglected or a member of a displaced or rejected people group, their crimes are mitigated.

As individual responsibility for crimes and bad behaviors continues to be diluted and diminished in our society, we can expect a rise in antisocial behavior and crime.  My student prayed intensely as he was dying.  But prayers for mercy, forgiveness, and restoration should be intense before we ever get to the point of death.  We need to pray for a lively conscience, and that our sense of righteousness and responsibility will be reinvigorated and restored.  Otherwise, we as a society will continue to drown in our soporific, watered down values.

 

Some negative economic news about our southern border neighbor.

 


Growing slowly south of the border

The economic news out of Mexico is a problem for Mexico.

Silvio Canto, Jr. | May 24, 2026 www.americanthinker.com

A Mexican friend recently said something like this: “Why are we sending oil to Cuba when we have our economic problems?” My friend’s words made more sense today after reading this economic update:

Mexico’s economy shrank 0.6% in the ​first quarter from the previous three-month period, data from the ‌national statistics agency INEGI showed on Friday, compared with a 0.8% decline expected by economists in a Reuters poll.

Latin America’s second-largest economy pulled back ​after revised growth of 0.7% in the fourth quarter of ​2025.

“The weakness was broad-based across the major sectors, reinforcing ⁠the view that the slowdown reflects fading domestic momentum rather ​than an isolated shock,” said Andres Abadia, chief LatAm economist at​Pantheon Macroeconomics.

Primary activities, which include farming, fishing and mining, recorded the steepest decline with a fall of 1.7%, according to INEGI’s data.

The secondary sector, which ​includes manufacturing and construction, and tertiary activities, which cover services, ​were down 1% and 0.4% respectively.

In annual terms, the economy expanded 0.2% compared ‌to ⁠a year earlier, slightly above the 0.1% growth expected by economists.

It looks like an economic slowdown south of the border. And another friend who just got back from a business trip to Mexico told me that gasoline prices were also very high.

Add to the bad economic news the information that remittances are down. As you may know, money going from here to there is not just cash transfers. It translates into food on the table and the ability to pay for many essentials of life. Here is that report:

Remittances to Mexico from abroad declined by 4.6% in 2025, to a total of US $61.8 billion, marking the biggest fall since 2009, the Bank of Mexico (Banxico) reported on Tuesday.

Remittances contributed 3.4% of Mexico’s GDP in 2025, according to an analysis by Banco BASE’s director of economic analysis, Gabriela Siller.

3.4% of GDP is a large number, and it represents a much larger share of many family budgets, particularly in the countrys rural areas. The remittances have turned into a double-edged sword. On the one hand, it supports families. On the other hand, it makes them dependent on their families up here.

Last, but not least, the US-Canada-Mexico free trade agreement is up for review soon. Add to all this the security issues, and China using the agreement to enter the US and Canadian markets.

Stay tuned for Mexico growing below expectations.

 

The current Administration continues to set the nation's immigration policies on a proper foundation.

 

Trump admin says migrants in US on visas must return home to apply for green card

The department said the change includes international students and temporary workers, stating those who are in the U.S. on temporary visas are expected to only remain in the country for a set time.

By Misty Severi justthenews.com 5-22-26

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services announced a change Friday to the way that migrants in the United States on a visa can apply for a green card, directing those who are trying to obtain the green card to return home for the process.

The department said the change includes international students and temporary workers, stating those who are in the U.S. on temporary visas are expected to only remain in the country for a set time.

“From now on, an alien who is in the U.S. temporarily and wants a Green Card must return to their home country to apply, except in extraordinary circumstances,” USCIS spokesperson Zach Kahler said in a statement. “When aliens apply from their home country, it reduces the need to find and remove those who decide to slip into the shadows and remain in the U.S. illegally."

The new process instructs migrants to apply for a green card through consular services in their home country instead of trying to change their status while already in the U.S.

“Following the law allows the majority of these cases to be handled by the State Department at U.S. consular offices abroad and frees up limited USCIS resources to focus on processing other cases that fall under its purview, including visas for victims of violent crime and human trafficking, naturalization applications, and other priorities," Kahler said.

The department said there will be some exceptions to the change, which will be granted on a case-by-case basis, but did not indicate what those exceptions would be.