Saturday, May 30, 2026

Medicaid fraud in Minnesota is rampant and must be stopped; those involved must be held accountable.

 

ICE arrests two Minnesota residents who are charged with $21 million in healthcare fraud

Authorities say that through two companies that one of the suspects owned, the defendants carried out a scheme to defraud a health care benefit program of approximately $21.1 million by submitting false claims to Medicaid.

By Kevin Killough justthenews.com 5-28-26

Two Minnesota residents were arrested on charges of health care fraud after allegedly stealing more than $21 million in taxpayer funds. 

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) arrested Shamso Ahmed Hassan and Hanaan Mursal Yusuf. They face eight counts of health care fraud and two counts of money laundering. 

Both women are U.S. citizens, with Hassan having been naturalized. 

Authorities say that through two companies that Hassan owned, Smart Therapy Center LLC and Star Autism Center LLC, the defendants carried out a scheme to defraud a health care benefit program of approximately $21.1 million by submitting false claims to Medicaid. They carried out the alleged activities over a four-year timespan. 

"Their Medicaid fraud scheme started during the COVID pandemic and lasted for four years. ICE continues to zero in on the rampant fraud in Minnesota. Under [Department of Homeland] Secretary [Markwayne] Mullin, we will end the defrauding of the American people," Acting Assistant Sec. Lauren Bis said in a statement

The suspects are being held in federal custody pending judicial proceedings. 

 

Whenever 'government money' flows, fraud, waste and abuse follows. Government must contain this abuse of taxpayer money!

 

Immigration nonprofits fair game for investigations, says new House task force leader Brandon Gill

Gill has taken particular interest in examining organizations and politicians who used their charitable status for political benefit.

By Amanda Head  justthenews.com 5-29-26

Nonprofits that abuse the government for political gain may soon find themselves in the investigative crosshairs of a newly formed House task force, says Texas GOP Rep. Brandon Gill, who will lead the panel under the House Oversight Committee.

The six-month Task Force on Defending Constitutional Rights and Exposing Institutional Abuses will examine illegal DEI policies, misuse of immigration and social welfare programs that defraud taxpayers, and efforts by foreign actors and dark money groups to suppress free speech. 

"You do not have the right to run an organization that takes tax dollars that engages in illegal activity or engages in domestic unrest or engages oftentimes in political activity, whether it's nonprofits or other sorts of entities that are taking government money," Gill, the task force chairman, told Just The News exclusively this week.

The freshman lawmaker was appointed to the chairmanship post by House Oversight Chairman James Comer, a Kentucky Republican.  

Gill argues that Congress has the responsibility to examine the issues of abuse and fraud and withhold funds from groups found to be in violation.

"We have to ask ourselves as elected representatives if it makes sense to take your hard-earned tax money and put it in the pockets of NGOs or other entities that are working against you and against American interests, and the answer is obviously no," said Gill, who also said his task will focus on defending constitutional rights against institutional abuses.

"So that's a big part of going after fraud and going after waste and abuse as well."

Gill and Comer took quick oversight action almost immediately after the task force was launched – requesting documents on alleged fraud in Ohio’s Medicaid Home and Community-Based Services program. 

Ohio's HCBS Medicaid waiver program provides such services as personal care, homemaking and chores to allow Medicaid recipients to live at home instead of in nursing facilities. Recent reporting exposed alleged widespread fraud, including improper or fake billing totaling potentially over $1 billion

Gill says that while fraud happens across the country, red states such as Ohio have been more willing to examine and investigate. 

"Most Republicans would agree with me that if there is fraud in a red state, we want to go after that just as aggressively as we would in a blue state," he said. "But the fact is that far more often than not, this fraud is taking place in states that Democrats control, whether it's California or New York or Minnesota or many other states."

Gill has taken particular interest in examining organizations and politicians who used their charitable status for political benefit.

"Those are the areas where we have found, like we did in Minnesota, that elected representatives kind of made a deal with fraudsters, that you can defraud the federal government or the state government, and we're going to look the other way, and we want you to vote for us," he told Just The News

"That was kind of the deal that elected representatives, Democrats, made in Minnesota. I think you see that in other areas where, essentially, the left is weaponizing the federal purse in order to pursue their own political gain and to attack Republicans, and that's something that we're going after aggressively."

In particular, recent fraud scandals in Minnesota have drawn intense scrutiny of the state's Democratic leadership.

Federal prosecutors estimate that fraud in social services programs – including Medicaid, child care, housing stabilization, and COVID-era nutrition initiatives like Feeding Our Future—could total up to $9 billion. 

High-profile cases include a $250 million scheme in which fraudsters submitted fake meal claims, leading to convictions such as a 41.5-year sentence for a key figure. 

Minnesota's Democratic Gov. Tim Walz faced heavy criticism for alleged lax oversight and slow response, contributing to his decision not to seek reelection. 

Critics, including Republicans, argue his administration fostered a “culture of tolerance” for fraud, while Democrats counter that they took the issue seriously, pursued investigations, and that GOP actions are politically motivated or tied to broader immigration enforcement, according to nytimes.com and cbsnews.com

The scandal has become a liability for other Democrats, such as Lt. Gov. Peggy Flanagan in the 2026 Senate race, amid ongoing congressional hearings and audits.

Another issue Gill and members of Congress are probing is foreign interference through nonprofits. 

Rep. Nicole Malliotakis, R-N.Y., talked about the work the House Ways and Means Committee is doing as the overseers of the IRS and tax policy. 

That committee has been investigating the issue of foreign interference through foreign money funneled into U.S. nonprofits to undermine and disrupt the country. Malliotakis says liberal trans-rights activist group Code Pink is the latest example

"We saw those college campus protests that were anti-Semitic being fueled by foreign money, and we've exposed a lot of it, and we've turned that over to the IRS for consideration," she said. 

"Here we have Code Pink. They've met with the Communist Cuba regime. They've met with the Communist Chinese regime. In fact, a lot of their money comes from Communist China. They've met with the Iranian regime, with the leadership of Hamas at one point. These are people who are actively working against the United States of America and trying to undermine us."

Malliotakis said that Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent will be appearing before the House Ways and Means Committee soon to talk about these issues, and she intends to make the 501c3 status of such groups a priority in her questioning, as they are effectively subsidized by taxpayers.

Other Republican members of the task force include Reps. Jim Jordan, of Ohio; Andy Biggs, of Arizona; Michael Cloud, of Texas; Byron Donalds, of Florida; and Brian Jack, of Georgia.

 

Friday, May 29, 2026

Another wise move to end the connection between illegal immigration and Fraud!

 

Trump Admin Targets Big Immigration’s Legal Industrial Complex

By: Breccan F. Thies May 27, 2026 thefederalist.com

 ‘It is standard practice for immigration attorneys representing illegal aliens to assert that virtually every illegal alien is going to be persecuted or tortured in his or her home country.’

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is starting to dismantle the legal industrial complex pushing for mass migration by cracking down on immigration lawyers who file fraudulent asylum claims.

DHS directed Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) on Tuesday to develop policies to go after the attorneys who aid and abet illegals obtaining legal entry and status in the United States fraudulently, under a law already establishing penalties for document fraud. DHS said that ICE attorneys will have “greater authority to enforce the law.”

“For many years, millions of illegal aliens have committed fraud in our immigration system. No place is this more rampant than in immigration court,” DHS General Counsel James Percival said. “Protection claims like asylum are intended to cover unique and narrow circumstances, but it is standard practice for immigration attorneys representing illegal aliens to assert that virtually every illegal alien is going to be persecuted or tortured in his or her home country.”

The move is in line with other Trump administration attempts to end Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for certain groups, but will ostensibly make it more difficult for migrants to successfully gain entry into the United States using pro-immigration lawyers coaching them on how to make false claims. Under such guidance, aliens often assert that their lives are at risk in their home country, when they are nothing more than economic migrants looking to take American jobs and access welfare programs.

As The Federalist reported, 54 percent of all immigrant households are on at least one welfare program, and 59 percent of illegal immigrant households are on welfare. Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS), explained that “because claims are so hard to prove, asylum will always be one of the most fraud-ridden parts of the immigration system. Limiting such fraud is especially important because asylum represents a surrender of a portion of our sovereignty, since foreigners can sneak into our country illegally and demand asylum, and if they qualify we are bound by international law to let them stay.”

It is not just that the asylum claimants gain access to the country, however. As America First Legal (AFL) stated, “the vast majority of aliens who apply for asylum, including those who entered the United States illegally, do so because it triggers access to work permits that effectively function as multi-year employment visas.” AFL recently submitted a public comment supporting DHS rulemaking that would stem the flood of migrants fraudulently claiming asylum to obtain work permits.

Immigration courts, and the lawyers who advocate for mass migration, are part of the behemoth apparatus of world migration from the Third World into Western civilizations, commonly known as “replacement migration.”

“The United States will not legitimize global compacts that enable mass migration into America or Western nations,” the U.S. State Department wrote on May 11. “Under President Trump, the State Department will facilitate remigration — not replacement migration.”

The Trump administration appears to have lost trust in the discretion of immigration courts, as Percival emphasized in his comments on Tuesday: “Historically, ICE has depended on the discipline of immigration judges and the enforcement of criminal fraud laws to deter this conduct, but ICE has its own tools.”

The Trump administration has also worked to revamp the legal infrastructure propping up the influx of migrants by surging hiring of immigration judges in order to be able to process proceedings more quickly. While it is likely to relieve the bottleneck of immigration cases, the surge will also allow the Trump administration to pick judges who are not going to bypass the law in order to maximize the number of immigrants entering the country.

According to CIS, Trump’s second term has already achieved a reduction in the backlog of cases for the first time in 17 years, but there are still millions to adjudicate.

The DHS effort to rein in immigration lawyers committing fraud comes after Trump issued a memorandum in March 2025 recognizing that “the immigration bar, and powerful Big Law pro bono practices, frequently coach clients to conceal their past or lie about their circumstances when asserting their asylum claims, all in an attempt to circumvent immigration policies enacted to protect our national security and deceive the immigration authorities and courts into granting them undeserved relief.”

 

Thursday, May 28, 2026

This post describes an interesting analogy about young people and crime and efforts of law enforcement.

 

Violent crime and demography

When we look at the data and identify the most common perpetrators, what does that mean for us in the context of mass importations of angry young men from violent nations?

Bill Ponton | May 27, 2026 www.americanthinker.com

What drives violent crime in society at large? First, we must establish a measure of violent crime. One reliable measure of violent crime is the homicide rate, simply because a dead body is a great indicator. The next question to ask is who would be most inclined to commit violent crime and murder? The answer seems obvious. It is young men in the prime of their life, ages 15–30. In fact, there exists a strong correlation (R2 = 0.67) between the percentage of a population in the 15–30 age bracket and the homicide rate (see Figure 1).



Figure 1

The percentage of young men in a population seems to be the dominant driving factor, but it does not fully explain the violent crime trend. Another factor is violent crime enforcement. A good measure of that is the number of police per capita. However, I was only able to gather a measure of it back to 1992.  Starting in that year, one sees the number of sworn officers per 100,000 residents rise, level off in the ‘00s and then decline after 2010 only to rebound a bit after 2015 (see Figure 2).



Figure 2

The increase in policing was a result of public outrage to the prior period of violent crime from 1970 -90. It is difficult to determine if the additional policing or the decline in the percentage of the population between age 15–30 was responsible for the precipitous drop in violent crime in the ‘90s. More than likely, it was a combination of the two factors. Additionally noteworthy is the spike in the homicide rate in 2020 attributable to the “defund the police” craze in the wake of George Floyd’s drug overdose death while in police custody.

So, it is only natural to ask, “What happens when our country imports a large number of young men from distant cultures?” Apart from some charming customs that they may impart to our culture, if one accepts my earlier reasoning, they will also bring a spike in violent crime.