Thursday, May 28, 2026

This post describes an interesting analogy about young people and crime and efforts of law enforcement.

 

Violent crime and demography

When we look at the data and identify the most common perpetrators, what does that mean for us in the context of mass importations of angry young men from violent nations?

Bill Ponton | May 27, 2026 www.americanthinker.com

What drives violent crime in society at large? First, we must establish a measure of violent crime. One reliable measure of violent crime is the homicide rate, simply because a dead body is a great indicator. The next question to ask is who would be most inclined to commit violent crime and murder? The answer seems obvious. It is young men in the prime of their life, ages 15–30. In fact, there exists a strong correlation (R2 = 0.67) between the percentage of a population in the 15–30 age bracket and the homicide rate (see Figure 1).



Figure 1

The percentage of young men in a population seems to be the dominant driving factor, but it does not fully explain the violent crime trend. Another factor is violent crime enforcement. A good measure of that is the number of police per capita. However, I was only able to gather a measure of it back to 1992.  Starting in that year, one sees the number of sworn officers per 100,000 residents rise, level off in the ‘00s and then decline after 2010 only to rebound a bit after 2015 (see Figure 2).



Figure 2

The increase in policing was a result of public outrage to the prior period of violent crime from 1970 -90. It is difficult to determine if the additional policing or the decline in the percentage of the population between age 15–30 was responsible for the precipitous drop in violent crime in the ‘90s. More than likely, it was a combination of the two factors. Additionally noteworthy is the spike in the homicide rate in 2020 attributable to the “defund the police” craze in the wake of George Floyd’s drug overdose death while in police custody.

So, it is only natural to ask, “What happens when our country imports a large number of young men from distant cultures?” Apart from some charming customs that they may impart to our culture, if one accepts my earlier reasoning, they will also bring a spike in violent crime.

 

Judges and Lawyers 'decide' on most everything or they put it in the hands of someone else to make the decision.

 

Supreme Court backs Trump over speech limits on immigration judges

The justices did not rule on the merits of the case, but merely reversed the lower court decision and sent it back for additional proceedings.

By Ben Whedon justthenews.com 5-26-26

The Supreme Court on Tuesday handed the Trump administration a win by reversing a lower court ruling against a requirement that immigration judges seek official approval before giving speeches in their official capacities.

The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals last year intervened in light of President Donald Trump's firing of several agency heads responsible for hearing complaints, Reuters reported. The policy stems from the Executive Office for Immigration Review, which oversees roughly 750 immigration judges.

The justices did not rule on the merits of the case, but merely reversed the lower court decision and sent it back for additional proceedings.

Nevertheless, the decision is a win for Trump, who has faced considerable judicial scrutiny over his immigration enforcement efforts and plans for mass deportations.

 

Wednesday, May 27, 2026

A very interesting post to set your mind on a different level of thinking.

 

IQ, Crime, Nobel Prizes, And Immigration: The Diversity That Is Destroying Western Civilization


 

Like water, culture — if it’s not protected — will flow to the lowest point until equilibrium sets in.

Vince Coyner | May 27, 2026 www.americanthinker.com

Sometimes data or information that seems completely disconnected can tell a story when taken together.  I experienced that recently.  Over the course of a few days I saw a number of posts on X that caught my attention.  First was a post stating that “Whites make up only 8% of the world’s population… so in fact, we are the minority.”  That 8% is down from a peak of approximately 25% in the 19th century.

Next I saw a post that featured a map of the world and showed the average IQ of the citizens. Hong Kong had the highest, with 107.7 while Somalia had the lowest 83.8. Both nations are largely homogeneous while the very diverse United States comes in at 101.  Generally sub-Saharan Africa has the lowest scores while eastern Asia has the highest.

Then I saw a post about Denmark and who commits crimes based on their nation of origin.  The data wasn’t pretty.  In every category from rape to attempted murder and everything in between, foreigners were far more likely to be the perpetrators than Danes.  Rape gives you an idea of exactly how the data played out:  Somalis were 20x more likely to commit rapes than Danes.  Syrians, 16x, Palestinians, 12x, Afghans, 11x, and Iraqis, 9x.  Somalis were 27x more likely to attempt to commit murder as well.

Then finally I saw a post that listed Nobel Prize winners by nationality.  The United States had by far the most, with 425, followed in second place by the U.K. with 114.  Of the 15 nations with the highest number of prizes, only one, Japan at #7 with 33, is the only one not from a largely white western nation. Of the one thousand or so prizes awarded since 1901, approximately 85% went to white males, 10% to women, 5% went to Asians, 2% to Latin Americans, and 1% to blacks. 

At this point I’ve got these disparate bits of information in my head, but nothing is quite clicking, but I’m certain there is something to be discerned. Then I realize I’m reading all of this on the backdrop of Europe and the rest of the West being invaded by people coming from the very nations that are on the bottom of those IQ score charts.  I say invaded, but in reality it’s more like the doors are being flung open by the globalist elites in Brussels and Washington.

Now of course, it has to be said that IQ scores are but one measure of a person.  Indeed, having a high IQ score doesn’t guarantee that someone is going to be a good or successful person. Both Ted Bundy and Ted Kaczynski were said to have IQs of approximately 136 while Mohammed Ali, known for his dazzling verbal agility, scored a 78.

Nonetheless, on a national scale there is a rather strong correlation between IQ and the wealth of a nation.  Which makes one question why the leaders of Western nations have been so adamant, for so long, that they must allow unfettered immigration from so many low IQ nations where the populations do not share the most fundamental of Western values?

The folly of such policies is legion.  Across Europe we read almost daily about women and children being raped by “migrants,” not to mention churches burning and no-go zones where police fear to enter.  Across the United States, in addition to blatant fraud, a majority of immigrants are recipients of government largesse and basic services like schools and hospitals are overwhelmed.

The reality is, “diversity” for diversity’s sake is never, ever, a positive for Western civilization.

Now, of course the left will cry that not everyone from Somalia or Afghanistan or Nicaragua has an IQ in the eighties, and even if they did, they deserve an opportunity to better their lives.  Both statements may be true individually, but neither suggests why the West should open its doors to them in aggregate. The reality is, there are members of any group who perform — or in this case score on an IQ test — better than the majority of citizens of their countries.  And while it might be nice to identify and offer such people entry, that’s not how it works.  In both Europe and the United States, for far too long the borders have simply been erased and tens of millions of third world “refugees” have entered, bringing with them the very third-world values that kept their nations from succeeding in the first place.

The reality is, over the last 500 years, almost all of the advances that have come about that have improved the lives of mankind have come from white males living in Western civilizations. This is particularly true since the founding of the United States.  That doesn’t mean that others haven’t contributed or that the white males got or get everything right, because they most certainly didn’t.  But it does make one wonder why the leaders of the civilizations built by that group are so determined to destroy everything that they built in the name of diversity.

If the goal were to improve the lives of the less fortunate around the world, Western leaders would be exporting the things that made the West successful in the first place… Law and order, education, capitalism, the scientific method, limited government, individual freedom, Christianity, and equality under the law.  In general, these are the foundational elements that created prosperity and built Western civilization, and the third world immigrants who are streaming into the West share almost none of them, and few assimilate to them once they arrive.

That dichotomy is a grenade waiting to explode.  The crime chart from the formerly safe Denmark makes that perfectly clear, as does the use of welfare programs by immigrants in the United States.

But of course, it’s not just IQ. Indeed, in the United States we have a program whose applicants dovetail with high-IQ programs — H-1B — but that program is terribly problematic as it sacrifices American workers so that big businesses can import Indians and pay them less for the same work.  At the same time, east Asian nations, with the highest IQ scores in the world, are sorely lacking in the kinds of advances reflected in Nobel prizes, which in turn drive advances and prosperity.

The reality is, Western civilization, for all of its many, many faults, has given mankind most of the things that drive the world today: Automobiles, telephones, airplanes, MRI machines, computers, and much more.  And the world envies it.  How can you tell?  Because millions of people from around the world invade the United States, France, the U.K., Italy, Sweden, and more every year. But how many people do you see paying coyotes thousands of dollars to sneak them into Mexico or Cuba or Somalia or India or Lebanon?  Not many.

As the influence of these third world “migrants” grows, particularly Muslims, the West will find its unprecedented standard of living continue to decline.  High-trust societies cannot import those who have no regard for the cultures of their hosts. Like water, culture — if it’s not protected — will flow to the lowest point until equilibrium sets in.  With whites at 8% of the world’s population and the foundational values that built Western civilization under attack from within and without, that equilibrium is going to look far more like Beirut or Mogadishu or Caracas than it will London or New York or Paris at their peaks.  No, thank you….

 

The Nation's immigration policies have created such a corrupt system; it absolutely amazing!

 

DHS moves to prosecute immigration lawyers for filing fraudulent asylum claims

US immigration officials have repeatedly warned about abuses in the asylum system.

Katie Daviscourt Seattle WA thepostmillenial.com 5-26-26

 The US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has directed US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to crack down on fraudulent asylum claims, including taking legal action against immigration attorneys who have a long practice of coaching their clients "to conceal their past" and/or "outright lie" in their asylum applications, DHS said in a Tuesday press release.

Under the directive, ICE is to adopt anti-fraud procedures in order to better implement 8 USC 1324c(d), a law that provides penalties for document fraud. This will enable ICE attorneys to take enforcement action against immigration lawyers who file false allegations in immigration court, according to DHS.

"For many years, millions of illegal aliens have committed fraud in our immigration system. No place is this more rampant than in immigration court," said DHS General Counsel James Percival in a press release. "Protection claims like asylum are intended to cover unique and narrow circumstances, but it is standard practice for immigration attorneys representing illegal aliens to assert that virtually every illegal alien is going to be persecuted or tortured in his or her home country. Historically, ICE has depended on the discipline of immigration judges and the enforcement of criminal fraud laws to deter this conduct, but ICE has its own tools. Now, thanks to this directive, ICE attorneys have greater authority to enforce the law and stop the abuse of our asylum system by illegal aliens and attorneys."

The Department of Homeland Security said the directive enforces President Donald Trump's March 2025 presidential memorandum titled, "Preventing Abuses of the Legal System and Federal Court."

The order, aimed, in part, at restoring integrity to the US immigration system, states: "The immigration system—where rampant fraud and meritless claims have supplanted the constitutional and lawful bases upon which the President exercises core powers under Article II of the United States Constitution is likewise replete with examples of unscrupulous behavior by attorneys and law firms."

"For instance," the order continues, "the immigration bar, and powerful Big Law pro bono practices, frequently coach clients to conceal their past or lie about their circumstances when asserting their asylum claims, all in an attempt to circumvent immigration policies enacted to protect our national security and deceive the immigration authorities and courts into granting them undeserved relief."

"This fraud in turn undermines the integrity of our immigration laws and the legal profession more broadly—to say nothing of the undeniable, tragic consequences of the resulting mass illegal immigration, whether in terms of heinous crimes against innocent victims like Laken Riley, Jocelyn Nungaray, or Rachel Morin, or the enormous drain on taxpayer resources intended for Americans," the order reads. 

US immigration officials, including Tom Homan, have repeatedly warned about abuses in the asylum system, particularly during the Biden administration, when nearly all migrants who illegally entered the US but claimed, without evidence, to be escaping persecution in their home countries were automatically granted asylum for an extensive time period. Additionally, CNN recently interviewed a Mexican woman who said she was waiting for Trump's term to end to come to the US, where she intended to claim asylum.