DEI NGO's are giving the system a terrible name!

 

Leftists Want All the Immigrants — Except if They’re White

DEI-obsessed non-governmental organizations are making the lives of white South African refugees miserable in the States.

By Emmy Griffin patriotpost.us 6-9-26

President Donald Trump has prioritized resettling South African refugees since taking office again in January 2025. Known as Afrikaners, these refugees are descendants of Dutch and French Huguenots who immigrated to the southernmost tip of Africa.

Afrikaners are facing racial discrimination and persecution in their own country. Because they are white, their black neighbors and the government have decided to take their land, torture their children, and even murder them. One might call it a second apartheid — only this time, the discrimination is reversed and genocidal.

Trump has allowed some 17,500 Afrikaners to come to the U.S. annually under refugee status. These refugees have promised to become self-sufficient and not become a burden on the U.S. welfare system. However, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) tasked with helping facilitate immigration, assimilation, and refugee care have made it their mission to derail this policy as much as they can.

Organizations like Church World Service (CWS), which is a left-leaning NGO, have decided to fight Trump in court. CWS’s biggest problem with Afrikaner refugees is that funding is available for their resettlement, while other refugee funding is being put on hold. CWS believes that this preferential treatment for Afrikaners is racial discrimination; ergo, it is willing to cancel tickets and leave them to die at the hands of those who hate them in their own country.

For Afrikaners, though, the roadblock doesn’t stop there. Once they arrive in the U.S., the NGOs whose job is to help refugees assimilate don’t know what to do with these English-speaking, educated white refugees. According to The Daily Wire, these NGOs are ignoring the Afrikaners at best and openly hostile at worst.

One refugee mother revealed that a Chicago-based NGO that was supposed to be supporting her family was not even doing the bare minimum. “They didn’t bring us anything, no food, no basic necessities, nothing,” she recounted. “They just honestly didn’t care. … They hated us. They literally asked us why are we here because there are refugees in Kenya that have been waiting for 35 years to come to the U.S., so what makes us so special.”

The refugees in Kenya are from Somalia, South Sudan, and the Democratic Republic of Congo. Somalis are the largest refugee group in Kenya. The U.S. has imported cities’ worth of Somali refugees, and, unfortunately, a sizable number of them have decided to defraud the U.S. welfare system and cheat American taxpayers. Also, at least the refugees in Kenya already have housing and shelter. For Afrikaners, that is not the case. No African countries will take them in.

The NGO Maine Immigrant and Refugee Services (MEIRS) wouldn’t help Afrikaners find jobs or secure Social Security cards and driver’s licenses. Another NGO, Jewish Family Services (JFS), actively placed a refugee family in a dangerous neighborhood where they were victims of break-ins twice in the span of just days.

These NGOs should have the easiest job ever. Afrikaners can read and speak English, are educated, and are willing and able to assimilate and work. However, because they are white, they somehow deserve poor treatment and should be made to suffer.

This is essentially DEI immigration. When refugee status becomes only about skin color and not about need, the non-governmental organizations that participate in the resettlement process should take a step back and reassess why they do what they do.

 

The Nation's Judiciary is in 'dire straights'; this Judge proves it!

 

Should a lying federal judge be impeached?

The foundation of our justice system is truthfulness--right?

Mike McDaniel | June 7, 2026 www.americanthinker.com

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2026/06/should_a_lying_federal_judge_be_impeached.html

Who is Eleanor Ross? She’s the Eleventh Circuit federal Judge who, for two years, had an affair with a police officer. Why would that be a problem? Because she regularly engaged in loud, B-movie comedy sex in her chambers, and lied about it. George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley explains:

“The Subject Judge characterized the allegations as ‘outrageous’ and ‘baseless’ and specifically denied each one. Apparently aware that Law Clerk A was the source of the allegations, the Subject Judge noted that the judge had repeatedly chastised Law Clerk A for performance issues, including ‘being on [the clerk’s] cell phone in court and in the office,’ ‘arriving to the office late,’ and wearing attire that the judge considered ‘too casual.’ The Subject Judge implied that Law Clerk A might have made allegations as a means of retaliating against the Subject Judge.”

“Subject judge,” because the Eleventh Circuit kept her name confidential, issued a “private reprimand, and the judge agreed not to serve on judicial committees or serve as Chief Judge. Her name quickly leaked.

 

 

Graphic: X Post

I agree with Turley, who questions a private reprimand and her fitness to serve as a judge. The foundation of our justice system is truthfulness, not only for witnesses, but for officers of the court. Lawyers can get in real trouble for lying in documents or even allowing a client to lie. They—particularly defense lawyers—sometimes get away with both, but the foundation remains. Police officers caught lying lose all credibility and usually, their careers, as they should.

At the Volokh Conspiracy, Josh Blackman entertained an essay on the topic by Emeritus Professor Arthur Hellman. Hellman notes critics who think the punishment accorded Ross is “woefully inadequate.” He and Blackman agree the next step should be considering impeachment, which is rarely done. Only 15 have ever been impeached; only eight have been convicted. One resigned before trial, charges against one were dismissed, and the rest were acquitted.

The judge who resigned in 2009 lied to a judicial panel investigating his conduct:

…Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner, a member of the House Judiciary Task Force on Judicial Impeachment, explaining Article III of the articles of impeachment against Judge Kent (p. H7061): "Clearly, everyone would agree that a judge who lies to a judicial body investigating his conduct … is not fit to remain on the bench." The House unanimously agreed to Article III as well as three other articles of impeachment.

That judge engaged in more egregious sexual misconduct than Ross, but Hellman notes:

So this is one of those rare instances in which the Judiciary has found that a sitting judge has engaged in conduct that is almost identical to conduct that the full House "has independently determined to constitute high crimes and misdemeanors warranting [a judge's] impeachment and removal from office."

Hellman concluded:

I have not said anything here about the conduct that was the subject of Judge Ross's false statements. Although not an appalling abuse of power like Judge Kent's conduct, the characterization in the Eleventh Circuit Special Committee report (p. 16) might support a separate article of impeachment. 

As Blackman notes in a separate article, the House Judiciary Committee is considering impeachment:

Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) said Wednesday that his staff has "already put together a memo" on the facts involved in the misconduct findings against Judge Eleanor Ross of the Atlanta-based US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.

The "key fact," he said in a brief interview, was that Ross lied to the judges investigating her misconduct.

Well, yes. But that’s not all the Committee ought to investigate. Why a private reprimand? Is Ross such an outstanding and invaluable judge the judicial investigators decided to retain her? If that’s true, why don’t they want her serving as Chief Judge or on judicial committees? Were they engaging in ass-covering about some other, unknown, misconduct by Ross or other judges, perhaps including members of the panel that investigated her? What hasn’t been released about their findings, their deliberations, or conclusions?

Obviously, her conduct could have exposed her to blackmail. Did that happen? Equally obviously, the panel was trying to avoid damage to the judiciary by public exposure of Ross’ behavior. That didn’t work out so well. Was Ross’ retaliation against the clerk worse than we know? Did she retaliate against other clerks?

Democrat claims about Supreme Court illegitimacy are based not in honesty but because the majority renders rulings based on the law and Constitution rather than Democrat political desires. But in the Ross case, A judge thinking with her genitals and lying about her conduct can do real damage to public opinion of the judiciary, an opinion that is already low enough.

 

If Legislators accomplish something good, it will eventually become bad - fraud is the culprit.

 

The H-1B visa fraud network

What was intended to attract the world’s brightest and best has been co-opted to monopolize finite opportunities at everyone else’s expense.

Amil Imani | June 8, 2026 www.americanthinker.com

The H-1B visa program, originally designed by the United States to attract the world’s brightest minds and bridge critical high-skilled labor gaps, has morphed into a playground for systemic manipulation. At the epicenter of this distortion is a highly sophisticated network of IT consulting firms, staff augmentation agencies, and body shops operating primarily out of India or managed by Indian-origin syndicates in the U.S. What was conceived as a pipeline for specialized talent — the software architects, researchers, and engineers capable of driving global innovation — has instead been choked by a deluge of coordinated deception, designed to monopolize a finite public resource at the expense of legitimate professionals worldwide.

The mechanics of this exploitation were laid bare during recent lottery cycles, exposing a staggering disparity between honest applicant volume and coordinated fraud. Because the annual allocation of H-1B visas is strictly capped by Congress at 65,000 caps, alongside a 20,000 master’s degree exemption, the selection process relies on a random computer lottery. For fiscal year 2024, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) recorded an unprecedented, mathematical anomaly of 781,000 total registrations. Shockingly, more than 408,000 of those entries were multiple registrations submitted on behalf of the exact same individuals. A shadowy conglomerate of shell companies and interlocking IT consultancies colluded to file dozens of duplicate applications for single candidates. By artificially inflating their numbers, these bad actors drastically reduced the selection odds for independent applicants to a dismal percentage, effectively hijacking the lottery through sheer volume.

The architecture of this fraud relies on a multi-tiered system of smoke and mirrors. Rather than offering real, specialized positions at established enterprises, these fraudulent operators utilize ghost offices — empty storefronts and mail-forwarding addresses scattered across states like Texas and California — to create the illusion of local demand. These entities submit legally binding attestations to the U.S. government affirming that a specific, specialized job awaits the foreign national. In reality, these positions are entirely fabricated. A prominent case recently prosecuted by the Department of Justice involved Indian-origin executives who went so far as to falsely promise placement at prestigious institutions, like the University of California, (allegedly) utilizing fraudulent employment contracts to siphon visas for non-existent projects. Once these visas are successfully obtained through deceit, the beneficiaries are benched — held in employment limbo without legal pay — until the firm can contract them out to actual American businesses as cut-rate contractors, undercutting the domestic labor market and violating federal wage protections.

The corruption is not limited to small-scale fraudulent rings; it extends historic roots into some of the largest tech conglomerates originating from the Indian subcontinent. To bypass the stringent oversight and numerical limits of the H-1B program, massive outsourcing giants have historically weaponized alternative visa pipelines, establishing a blueprint for systematic evasion. This institutional misconduct was punctuated when Infosys paid a record-shattering $34 million civil settlement to immigration authorities following allegations of systemic visa fraud. Federal investigators discovered that the company was systematically using B-1 visitor visas — intended for short-term business meetings — to deploy foreign nationals for full-time, hands-on software development work in the United States. To pull this off, the corporation explicitly distributed internal “Dos and Don’ts” memos, coaching foreign employees to deliberately lie to U.S. consular officers, and scrub their correspondence of revealing technical words like implementation, design, or testing that would indicate they were arriving to perform actual local employment.

The damage inflicted by this institutionalized gaming of the system is vast and multifaceted. It breeds a culture of exploitation where the foreign workers themselves are trapped by predatory employers who hold absolute power over their legal status, often taking kickbacks or withholding wages. Simultaneously, it locks out genuine global talent — brilliant scientists, medical professionals, and innovators, who possess genuine job offers from premier institutions but are shut out by a lottery system stacked against them by automated fraud rings. This rampant gaming of federal regulations finally forced USCIS to dismantle its old framework, moving to a strict beneficiary-centric selection model for the fiscal year 2025 and 2026 cycles, an intervention that saw fraudulent multiple registrations plummet from over 400,000 down to fewer than 8,000.

While these tighter guardrails have begun to stem the flow of duplicate registry scams, the legacy of this deception casts a long shadow. Decades of unpunished exploitation have permanently distorted the public perception of skilled immigration, fueling valid domestic skepticism and provoking aggressive regulatory crackdowns, including sweeping executive restrictions on entry. The widespread fraud originating from India’s predatory IT shell sector has not just broken American immigration laws; it has actively betrayed the global community of honest professionals, turning a merit-based ideal into a game of corporate numbers where the only true winners are the cartels pulling the strings.

It's amazing when 'Lawyers and Judges' legislate and implement federal immigration laws.

 

Rhode Island judge rules Trump admin is 'anti-immigrant' and bans block on asylum seekers from terrorist-harboring nations

McConnell claims that the administration's policies "were motivated by anti-immigrant animus" and not by national security concerns.

Libby Emmons Brooklyn NY Jun 6, 2026 thepostmellenial.com

 A federal judge in Rhode Island has decided that he, and not the federal government, is responsible to decide who should enter the United States and under what circumstances. Judge John James McConnell Jr., against whom impeachment has been sought by Georgia Rep. Andrew Clyde, determined that the Department of Homeland Security is not permitted to pause asylum claims to the US.

 McConnell claimed in his ruling that the plaintiffs, in this case non-profit groups Dorcas International, Refugee Dream Center, Service Employees International Union, International Union of United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, African Communities Together, Venezuelan Association of Massachusetts, Partnership for the Advancement of New Americans and American Gateways, "have observed the legal processes that Congress enacted by statute and USCIS promulgated by regulation so that they may one day obtain immigration benefits."

He complained that though the plaintiffs "have, for example, filed the appropriate paperwork, paid the required filing fees, submitted to this requested biometrics collection and attended the necessary in person interview," they are now "stuck waiting, for months on end, for benefit requests that USCIS refuses to adjudicate."

In other words, those seeking entry into the United States are entitled to it and cannot be denied. McConnell stated that the federal government's immigration authority has "violated the very immigration laws that Congress has charged it with administering, as well as the administrative laws that govern the agency's actions."

"Local judge says it’s illegal to restrict migration and that America actually belongs to 8 billion foreigners—not you or your family and that no matter who you vote for you will be dispossessed. If SCOTUS doesn’t restrain these judges the people will lose all faith in the courts," said White House aide Stephen Miller.

In making his ruling, McConnell claims that the administration's policies "were motivated by anti-immigrant animus" and not by national security concerns. He worried that those already in the US would be thrown into "indeterminate legal limbo." McConnell didn't believe DHS of the Secretary of State's assertions that those from these nations posed national security risks.

In June 2024, the Biden administration offered a sweeping mass amnesty to illegal immigrants, dismissing 77% of asylum cases without giving them either asylum or legal status. That resulted in hundreds of thousands of people who applied for asylum under Biden's lax rules staying in the country without their cases being heard or assessed.

 Biden had also changed the asylum rules, without Congressional approval, to allow asylum seekers to wait in the United States for their hearings, often years down the road. The administration claimed it was "prosecutorial discretion" to terminate the cases "without a decision on the merits."

McConnell has taken it upon himself to determine both the national security risks posed by nationals from nations where terrorism is harbored, encouraged, and flourishing, and to create a new bias category that he believes the government has fallen prey to, "anti-immigrant animus." 

The Trump administration had sought to bar asylum claims from 39 countries. President Donald Trump issued a proclamation restricting entry from nationals of those nations and suspended the entry to the US of nationals from 19 countries.

The proclamation states that the US has an obligation to protect her citizens from foreigners "who intend to commit terrorist attacks, threaten our national security and public safety, incite hate crimes, or otherwise exploit the immigration laws for malevolent purposes." The Immigration Nationality Act gives the president the authority "to suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens" when the president "finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States."

Those nations Trump wished to suspend from making asylum claims include Afghanistan, Burkina Faso, Burma, Chas, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Laos, Libya, Mali, Niger, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Suda, Syria, Yemen, Angola, Antigua & Barbuda, Benin, Burundi, Cote d'Ivoire, Cuba, Dominica, Gabon, The Gambia, Malawi, Mauritania, Nigeria, Senegal, Tanzania, Togo, Tonga, Turkmenistan, Venezuela, Zambia and Zimbabwe. Many exceptions to the rules were included. Many of these are nations that harbor terrorists and have animus and hatred for the United States.

McConnell has ruled against the Trump administration repeatedly. Appointed by President Obama, McConnell has ruled against the Department of Agriculture's plan to pause food benefits while Congress shut down the government, refusing to fund the programs. He ruled against Trump after the administration sought to revoke funds for public works projects in states that refused to follow federal immigration law.

In the impeachment resolution against him, he is accused of allowing "his personal, political opinions to influence his decisions and rulings." In 2021, he spoke about the processing of sentencing, saying "When you’re sentencing someone that you have to take a moment and realize that this you know middle class, white, male privileged person needs to understand the human being who comes before us that may be a woman or may be black maybe be transgender maybe poor maybe rich maybe whatever may had experiences but not yours and may have to walk in their shoes and understand that the law applies to them where they are um and then you have to apply the law accordingly."