9/22/2017 - Pat Buchanan Townhall.com
If a U.S.
president calls an adversary "Rocket Man ... on a mission to
suicide," and warns his nation may be "totally destroyed," other
ideas in his speech will tend to get lost.
Which is
unfortunate. For buried in Donald Trump's address is a clarion call to reject
transnationalism and to re-embrace a world of sovereign nation-states that
cherish their independence and unique identities.
Western man
has engaged in this great quarrel since Woodrow Wilson declared America would
fight in the Great War, not for any selfish interests, but "to make the
world safe for democracy."
Our
imperialist allies, Britain, France, Russia, Japan, regarded this as
self-righteous claptrap and proceeded to rip apart Germany, Austria, Hungary
and the Ottoman Empire and to feast on their colonies.
After World
War II, Jean Monnet, father of the EU, wanted Europe's nations to yield up
their sovereignty and form a federal union like the USA.
Europe's
nations would slowly sink and dissolve in a single polity that would mark a
giant leap forward toward world government -- Alfred, Lord Tennyson's
"Parliament of man, the Federation of the world."
Charles De
Gaulle lead the resistance, calling for "a Europe of nation-states from
the Atlantic to the Urals."
For 50
years, the Gaullists were in constant retreat. The Germans especially, given
their past, seemed desirous of losing their national identity and disappearing
inside the new Europe.
Today, the
Gaullist vision is ascendant.
"We do
not expect diverse countries to share the same cultures, traditions, or even
systems of government," said Trump at the U.N.
"Strong
sovereign nations let diverse countries with different values, different
cultures, and different dreams not just coexist, but work side by side on the
basis of mutual respect. ...
"In
America, we do not seek to impose our way of life on anyone, but rather to let
it shine as an example for everyone to watch."
Translation:
We Americans have created something unique in history. But we do not assert
that we should serve as a model for mankind. Among the 190 nations, others have
evolved in different ways from diverse cultures, histories, traditions. We may
reject their values but we have no God-given right to impose ours upon them.
It is
difficult to reconcile Trump's belief in self-determination with a National
Endowment for Democracy whose reason for being is to interfere in the politics
of other nations to make them more like us. Trump's idea of patriotism has deep
roots in America's past.
After the
uprisings of 1848 against the royal houses of Europe failed, Lajos Kossuth came
to seek support for the cause of Hungarian democracy. He was wildly welcomed
and hailed by Secretary of State Daniel Webster.
But Henry Clay,
more true to the principles of Washington's Farewell Address, admonished
Kossuth:
"Far
better is it for ourselves, for Hungary, and for the cause of liberty that,
adhering to our wise, pacific system, and avoiding the distant wars of Europe,
we should keep our lamp burning brightly on the western shore as a light to all
nations, than to hazard its utter extinction amid the ruins of fallen or
falling republics in Europe."
Trump's
U.N. address echoed Clay: "In foreign affairs, we are renewing this founding
principle of sovereignty. Our government's first duty is to its people ... to
serve their needs, to ensure their safety, to preserve their rights, and to
defend their values."
Trump is
saying with John Quincy Adams that our mission is not to go "abroad in
search of monsters to destroy," but to "put America first." He
is repudiating the New World Order of Bush I, the democracy crusades of the
neocons of the Bush II era, and the globaloney of Obama.
Trump's
rhetoric implies intent; and action is evident from Rex Tillerson's directive
to his department to rewrite its mission statement -- and drop the bit about
making the world democratic.
The current
statement reads: "The Department's mission is to shape and sustain a
peaceful, prosperous, just, and democratic world."
Tillerson
should stand his ground. For America has no divinely mandated mission to
democratize mankind. And the hubristic idea that we do has been a cause of all
the wars and disasters that have lately befallen the republic.
If we do
not cure ourselves of this interventionist addiction, it will end our republic.
When did we dethrone our God and divinize democracy? And are 21st-century
American values really universal values?
Should all
nations embrace same-sex marriage, abortion on demand, and the separation of
church and state if that means, as it has come to mean here, the paganization
of public education and the public square?
If freedom
of speech and the press here have produced a popular culture that is an open
sewer and a politics of vilification and venom, why would we seek to impose
this upon other peoples?
For the
State Department to declare America's mission to be to make all nations look
more like us might well be regarded as a uniquely American form of moral
imperialism.
No comments:
Post a Comment