2/11/2018 - Arthur Schaper Townhall.com
My Congressman Ted Lieu
(D-Torrance) hosted another error-ridden town hall in Hermosa Beach last week.
On immigration, he claimed to support two parts of President Trump’s
proposed(?) plan: granting legal status to 1.8 million young illegals; and
enhancing border security (although Lieu called the border wall “stupid”). He
differed on ending chain migration and the diversity lottery. He quoted the
Bible in his defense: “For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was
thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me
in.” (Matthew 25:35).
My response: “Then take
them into your home!” Amnesty advocates preach their open-border morality, but
don’t live up to it. Moreover, Jesus’ statement is directed toward individuals
who welcomed strangers into their own homes voluntarily. Any form of
amnesty imposed by our government is not voluntary.
My consternation with
these Biblical arguments has grown since
reading this article in the Christian Post, when evangelical
leaders, many of whom I respect, pressured Congress to pass some kind of DREAM Act.
Pastor Samuel Rodriguez of Sacramento, CA stated in a January press conference:
"The wall is a physical object created by man. 800,000 human beings
created in the image of God by God.” Walls are Biblical, affirmed by God in
Scripture. In fact, God commands the construction of walls around Jerusalem
both the Old (Nehemiah 1:1-7:3) and the New (Isaiah 54: 12; Ezekiel 42:20).
In another letter
to Congress, Evangelical leaders wrote: "Roughly 700,000 young people are
poised to lose their right to work lawfully in the U.S., not to mention their
dreams of a future in this country—the country they were brought to as
children, without choice.” First of all, this country is not responsible for
their parents’ crimes, which have harmed their children. Children should not be
punished for the sins of their parents (cf. Jeremiah 31:29), but natural
consequences remain. A mother breaks into my home, steals my car, and her
children use the ill-gotten gains for good. I am still entitled to restoration
of my property (Exodus 22). Illegal aliens are stealing this country’s space,
resources, and wealth.
In response to these
pro-enforcement arguments, preachers cite The New Covenant (Hebrews 8:10-012),
which asserts that we are no longer under law, but under grace. However, grace
is not arbitrary. Jesus died on a Cross for the sins of the world, the just for
the unjust (1 John 2:2; 1 Peter 3:18). A payment must be rendered. Why should
law-abiding citizens pay for lawbreakers?
If Christian leaders
want to preach accurately on immigration, they should first acknowledge a few
things:
- Nations are God’s idea, not merely man’s construction, and rewarding illegal immigration harms nations. Genesis 11 reports God created multiple languages—and nations—to stop mankind from building the Tower of Babel. The dissolution of border security and national sovereignty are unholy gestures. To contend for amnesty based on a misplaced understanding of scripture is not tenable. There will come a time when every knee will bow, and every tongue confess Christ Jesus as Lord, but for now nation-states remain as part of God’s plan. Rampant amnesties only erode national boundaries.
- Citizenship is a principle defended in the Bible. In the Old Testament, strangers were respected (Leviticus 19:34, Deuteronomy 10: 19), but they were expected to adopt all the customs of Israel, not retain their original cultural views (Numbers 15: 14-29). In the New Testament, Paul the apostle asserted his Roman citizenship to redress the abusive treatment of Roman soldiers (Acts 22:22-23:11). He also addressed his fellow Christians as “citizens of heaven” (Philippians 3:20, Colossians 3:5-16). Membership in a defined, national compact matters and should not be pushed aside. Many illegals in this country, especially DREAMers, are hell-bent on retaining and imposing a neo-pagan culture in this country, estranged and unsubmissive to our country’s constitutional rule and civic culture.
- Christians are called to honor their rulers (and rules!) among the nations (1 Timothy 2:1-2; 1 Peter 2:17). To dismiss the authority of temporal rulers, especially on matters of immigration, is unholy and unwise.
Instead of championing
amnesty, Christian leaders should reference the ideal immigrant: Ruth the
Moabite. Unlike the 11 to 16 million illegal aliens in our country, per
official tallies, Ruth did not break into her adoptive nation of Israel. She
had a sponsor, her mother-in-law Naomi. There were other factors which Ruth
obeyed, too (Ruth 1:16-17):
- “For whither thou goest, I will go”: She would attend to Naomi, recognizing her place in her new country as based solely on the goodness of her mother-in-law. She did not enter into Israel as a political radical or busy-body.
- “Where thou lodgest, I will lodge”: She would live with Naomi, not depending on someone else, particularly the state or taxpayers, to provide her housing. Her needs would come from her sponsor, not by force from other inhabitants in Israel.
- “Your people will be my people”: This statement sums up assimilation perfectly. She pledged to become an Israelite. How often do our leaders today talk about the importance of immigrants adopting American customs, rather than demanding that we accommodate their foreign ways?
- “Thy God [will be] my God.”: while our free society does not demand religious adherence to one creed, we should expect immigrants to embrace our cultural and moral values. For this reason, I am adamant against accepting adherents of Sharia Law, for example, or other religious sects which endanger life and property.
- “Where thou diest, will I die, and there will I be buried”: Ruth pledged a complete break with her pagan country and culture. She refused to abandon her new country or identity.
At the very least,
politicians and pastors should stop shaming the public by misusing Scripture.
Christians should have a ready defense when amnesty advocates distort Scripture
for selfish political ends. Every country has a right to strong borders, safe
citizens, and a secured sovereignty. These are not un-Christian expectations in
the slightest.
No comments:
Post a Comment