3/21/2018 - Arthur Schaper Townhall.com
When all seemed lost, a
little city made the move to help Make California Great Again. Los Alamitos,
the second smallest city in Orange County, just passed a huge ordinance
asserting the city’s compliance with the United States Constitution.
Specifically, in an unprecedented yet necessary state, the council voted to opt
out of the immoral, unconstitutional mandates of SB 54, aka the California
“Values” Act or Sanctuary State law.
For the last three
years, California’s Democratic dominance has voted to disregard federal
immigration laws. Now they are seeing their deep blue bubble burst. Whether
they like it or not, California remains a part of the United States. The
Founding Charter of our country, the United States Constitution, is still the
Supreme Law of the Land. Yet even with Attorney General Jeff Sessions’
latest series of lawsuits, plus ICE’s ramped-up operations, California citizens
need relief from Sacramento’s legislative lawlessness. One of the smallest
enclaves in Orange County, Los Alamitos displays its rich, diverse heritage in
its coat of arms, and they took the first major step to undermine SB 54
outright.
Small cities have
quiet, small chambers, and Los Alamitos was no exception. I arrived nearly two
hours early to get a seat. Within 30 minutes, riotous pro-illegal groups
throughout Southern California swarmed the plaza, along with left-wing
religious figures, college students and members of the ACLU. The Los Alamitos
Police Department showed up in full force, probably the first time in the
city’s history.
After moving through
other city business, the ordinance sponsor, Councilman Kusumoto, explained the
reason for this proposal. First, he had hoped that SB 54 would not pass, but
such hopes seem hopelessly naïve now, especially since power-hungry Democrats
want to run for statewide or federal office based on defying President Trump.
He pointed out to the public that SB 54 places law enforcement in a
precariously tight position. Business owners are damned either way. If they
comply with ICE for a business audit, State Attorney General Becerra has
promised to fine and prosecute those business owners. Mayor Pro Tem
Warren Kusumoto, himself a descendant of Japanese immigrants who moved to
Hawaii then California, wanted to resolve the intractable conflict between
federal and state laws and had worked for five months on his proposed
ordinance with the help of his colleagues.
Proponents emphasized
the rule of law and public safety. Genevieve Peters of Sherman Oaks talked about
the American Revolution, in which our forefathers fought against a government
undermining our rights. Elsa Aldequer of Winnetka, a legal immigrant from El
Salvador, talked about how illegal aliens are making her communities less safe
as well as depriving Americans of jobs. The opponents slammed the “racist,
anti-immigrant Trump Administration” for suing the state of California. One Los
Alamitos resident shared that she feared for her and her daughter’s safety
walking down the street if the city rejected SB 54. If she was legal, what does
she have to worry about?
Another resident
pointed to the three flags on the city seal as a reminder of where the city
comes from. Of course, enforcement of immigration laws does not signal
anti-immigrant sentiment--quite the contrary. Two other hostile elements
erupted on the scene opposing the ordinance, including a troubled young woman
called “RG. Wong.” Twice she shrieked at the audience “Shut the hell up!”
while decrying the proposed ordinance. She then flipped off detractors as she
stormed out of the room. Then notable irritant Naui Huitzilopochtli, a radical
who believes that the American Southwest is “stolen land,” spent more time
attacking members of the audience than speaking to the ordinance itself, Other
high school and college students gave emotional pleas about separating families
and targeting otherwise law-abiding immigrants. The Left loves to lump together
legal immigrants and illegal aliens into one group, “immigrant.” That is really
offensive, and one member of the audience blasted that abuse of the English
Language. For the first time in recent memory for me as an activist, a
comparable number of people in the audience were pro-immigration enforcement
and pro-Trump.
Finally, the city
councilmembers offered their views on the ordinance. Two were concerned about
the potential cost and effectiveness of a city ordinance. Councilwoman
Hasselbrink applauded everyone, including the children, for speaking out. She
then pivoted to the fundamental premise of the discussion, as simple as high
school civics. If there is a conflict between federal and state law, the
federal law must be followed, as per Article VI, Section 2 of the United States
Constitution. She disparaged opponents for ignoring the distinction between
legal and illegal, just as “there is a difference between driving and drunk
driving.”
Finally, Councilman
Kusumoto signaled his continued support to clear up the confusion wrought by SB
54. He asserted that this issue goes beyond immigration to the rule of law
itself. Then Mayor Troy Edgar explained his stance. City councilmembers face a
hard task. They have to reconcile differences among their colleagues and within
the community. “This is activism,” he pointed to the audience, and it’s not
always easy or nice. He then disparaged the argument from opponents who claimed
that the city of Los Alamitos is too small a locale to take on this issue. “We
lead in safety and schools. We should lead on this issue, too.” With that, the
city voted 4-1 to opt out of SB 54 and follow federal immigration law. The
audience burst into applause. I leapt for joy, along with fellow Trump
supporters. We hugged each other to celebrate this small victory—which we hope
will lead to more cities siding with the United States Constitution.
Ann Coulter joked that
Trump should build a wall and keep California out. Sorry Ann, but there are 4.5
million Trump supporters in the once-Golden State, and we are starting a second
American Revolution, a restoration of the rule of law and the United States
Constitution within our own state.
No comments:
Post a Comment