12/24/2019 - Pat Buchanan
As
that rail and subway strike continued to paralyze travel in Paris and across
France into the third week, President Emmanuel Macron made a Christmas appeal
to his dissatisfied countrymen:
"Strike
action is justifiable and protected by the constitution, but I think there are
moments in a nation's life when it is good to observe a truce out of respect
for families and family life."
Macron's
appeal has gone largely unheeded.
"The
public be damned!" seems to be the attitude of many of the workers who are
tying up transit to protest Macron's plan to reform a pension system that
consumes 14% of GDP.
Macron
wants to raise to 64 the age of eligibility for full retirement benefits. Not
terribly high. And to set an example, he is surrendering his lifetime pension
that is to begin when he becomes an ex-president.
Yet,
it is worth looking more closely at France because she appears to be at a place
where the rest of Europe and America are headed.
In
France, the government collects 46% of the GDP in taxes and spends 56% of GDP,
the highest figures in the Western world.
And
Paris appears to be bumping up against the limits of what democratic voters
will tolerate in higher taxes, or reductions in benefits, from the postwar
welfare states the West has created.
A
year ago, when Macron sought to raise fuel taxes to cut carbon emissions, the
"yellow vests" came out in protests that degenerated into rioting,
looting, arson, desecration of monuments and attacks on police. Paris
capitulated and canceled the tax.
How
do we compare?
The
U.S. national debt is now larger than the GDP. Only in 1946, the year after
World War II, was U.S. debt a larger share of GDP than today.
In
2019, the U.S. ran a deficit just shy of $1 trillion, and the U.S. government
projects trillion-dollar deficits through the decade, which begins next week.
And we will be running these deficits not to stimulate an economy in recession,
as President Obama did, but to pile them on top of an economy at full
employment. In short, we are beginning to run historic deficits in a time of
prosperity. Whatever the economic theory behind this, it bears no resemblance
to the limited government-balanced budget philosophy of the party of Ronald
Reagan.
The
questions the U.S. will inevitably face are the ones France faces: At what
point does government consumption of the national wealth become too great a
burden for the private sector to bear? At what point must cuts be made in
government spending that will be seen by the people, as they are seen in France
today, as intolerable?
While
a Republican Congress ran surpluses in the 1990s, when defense spending fell
following our Cold War victory, Dwight Eisenhower was the last Republican
president to run surpluses.
Opposition
to new or higher taxes appears to be the one piece of ground today on which
Republicans will not yield. But if so, where are the cuts going to come from
that will be virtually mandated if U.S. debt is not to grow beyond any
sustainable level?
America's
long-term problem:
Deficits
are projected to run regularly in the coming decade at nearly 5% of GDP while
economic growth has fallen back to 2%. With taxes off the table, where, when
and how do we cut spending? Or does each new administration kick the can down
the road?
The
five principal items in the federal budget are these:
Social
Security, which consumes 25% of that budget. Yet, Social Security outlays will
reach the point this year where payroll taxes no longer cover them. The
"trust fund" will have to be raided.
Translation: The feds will have
to borrow money to cover the Social Security deficit.
Medicare,
Medicaid, Obamacare, and other health programs account for another fourth of
the budget. All will need more money to stay solvent.
Defense,
which used to take 9% of GDP in JFK's time and 6% in Ronald Reagan's buildup,
is now down to 3.2% of GDP.
Yet,
while defense's share of GDP is among the smallest since before World War II,
U.S. commitments are as great as they were during the Cold War. We are now
defending 28 NATO nations, containing Russia, and maintaining strategic parity.
We have commitments in Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan and the global war on terror.
We defend South Korea and Japan from a nuclear-armed North Korea and China.
Yet
another major item in the budget is interest on the debt.
And
as that U.S. debt surges with all the new deficits this decade, and interest
rates inevitably begin to rise, interest on the debt will rise both in real
terms and as a share of the budget.
Again,
is France the future of the West?
No comments:
Post a Comment