4/16/2020 - Victor Davis Hanson Townhall.com
We
are a few days away from a rendezvous with some tough conclusions about
COVID-19.
A
number of concurrent developments are coming to a head. Most will bring light
where so far there was only heat.
Greater
information about the virus might cause as much acrimony as conciliation. Some
experts will be discredited, others reaffirmed.
Antibody
testing is expected to get under way shortly. Soon, several representative
studies will give the country an accurate idea of how many Americans have been
infected in the past few months.
With
a more trustworthy denominator to compare against known deaths, we will finally
learn just how lethal the virus is and whether comparisons to a severe annual
flu are legitimate or still inapplicable.
Likewise,
there will be greater precision in distinguishing those whose deaths were
exclusively virus-related from those who were afflicted by serious chronic
illnesses along with the virus. That will also help provide better data about
the actual toxicity of the virus.
Those
with antibodies will likely be able to return to work with little risk.
Arguments will arise over whether their status should be cataloged and banked,
or whether such classification would institutionalize creepy two-tier
categories of citizenship.
The
prior pessimism of most epidemic models will either be confirmed or refuted,
depending on the percentages of Americans who have already weathered the virus.
If
past predictions are proven too gloomy, their authors will still claim that
their doomsday prognoses at least prompted needed social distancing. Critics
will counter that their paranoia caused untold social and economic damage.
If
other experts are discovered to have unduly played down the deadliness of the
virus, they will be derided as callous and partly responsible for the
outbreak's mayhem.
There
are ongoing trials to determine the efficacy of Hydroxychloroquine to treat
COVID-19. President Trump and some health officials have touted the
controversial anti-malarial drug as a possible treatment. Other health
officials are skeptical.
But
soon, the formal trial results should determine whether the drug offers only
false hope or speeds recovery and saves lives. Lots of reputations are on the
line.
The
weather is warming as we reach mid-spring, and summer approaches. Still another
debate may soon be settled. Will rising temperatures slow the epidemic, as some
confidently predicted based on other viral outbreaks? Or are skeptics right
that the coronavirus will still spread and is hardier than the seasonal flu?
Some
parts of the country are now nearing a month of shelter-in-place policies. The
economists warn that we are already in full recession and the current lockdown
is not sustainable for much longer.
Their mounting worry is not just about
economic devastation but about a greater loss of life than COVID-19's toll
through wrecked livelihoods, stress, substance abuse, suicides and the
inability to address medical issues.
The
somnolent economy is analogous to a patient who is to be brought back from a
forced coma. No one quite knows how, or even if, the economy will fully awaken
-- only that the chances it might not increase the longer it stays comatose.
In
the coming days, the president will have to make a lose/lose decision to either
inaugurate a graduated return to work or keep the country locked down for weeks
longer.
Economists
will likely urge him to restart the economy as fast as possible.
Epidemiologists will warn of a second viral spike if millions go back to work.
Trump will either be praised for saving the American economy or damned for
dooming thousands.
Timelines
grow shorter. The virus and the draconian reaction to it are wearing down a
quarantined America.
Thousands
of scientists worldwide are running a frantic Nobel Prize race to discover a
vaccine for COVID-19. Each week, we will hear that they are either getting
closer to discovery or learning that the code of the new virus is proving
harder to crack.
China
has never come clean about the origin and spread of the virus that broke out in
Wuhan. But more information is leaking out. Soon, Beijing will have to decide
whether it will become part of the answer to the mystery or continue its
cover-up.
As
the days pass, the November election also draws nearer. Every presidential
decision concerning the epidemic will be inevitably politicized. Trump
supporters will likely favor a quick return to work to avoid a November
recession. His opponents prefer a longer shutdown.
Both
sides know, but will deny, that politics plays a role in how they view the
crisis.
Nothing
about this epidemic was ever static. But we are on the verge of learning a lot
more about the virus that will result in as much disagreement as relief.
No comments:
Post a Comment