Congress
moves to abolish sanctuary cities and states—it’s about time
By
Susan Quinn www.americanthinker.com
The
progressives have had their way for far too long when it comes to illegal
immigration. Republicans have tolerated their insistence on harboring illegal
aliens and criminals, and the time has finally arrived to stop this violation
of the law and provide safety and security for our citizens. Both the Executive
Branch and Congress are stepping up to honor the rule of law.
On
January 22, several
Republican Senators promoted a new bill on the issue:
Today,
Senators Ted Budd (R-NC), Thom Tillis (R-NC), Bill Cassidy (R-LA), Kevin Cramer
(R-ND), Katie Britt (R-AL), Roger Marshall (R-KS), Ted Cruz (R-TX), Tim Sheehy
(R-MT), Lindsey Graham (R-SC), James Lankford (R-OK), and Mike Rounds (R-SD)
introduced the Justice for Victims of Sanctuary Cities Act.
The
bill would allow the victims of murders, rapes, and other felonies committed by
illegal aliens to sue sanctuary states or cities that failed to honor a
detainer request. The legislation also bans certain federal grants to sanctuary
jurisdictions. Senator Budd twice led this legislation in the U.S. House
in 2019 and 2021.
Both
senators Tillis and Budd made powerful statements in support of this bill. Here
is Senator Tillis’s statement,
in part:
‘I
am committed to working with President Trump to end illegal immigration and
fight sanctuary cities that prioritize reckless, lawless policies over public
safety. It is clear that liberal politicians want to put political ideology
ahead of the safety of their constituents. It is time for Congress to step in
and hold sanctuary cities accountable.’
The
House proposed
a similar bill to stop these violations of federal law, initiated by Rep. Chris
Langworthy:
Today,
Congressman Nick Langworthy (NY-23) introduced the Stop Dangerous
Sanctuary Cities Act of 2025 to block federal funding for sanctuary
jurisdictions that prohibit or restrict local law enforcement from sharing
immigration status information or cooperating with federal immigration
enforcement efforts. Sanctuary cities are actively undermining federal
immigration enforcement by refusing to cooperate with ICE detainer requests and
releasing dangerous criminals back onto our streets. It’s time to hold them
accountable.
Additionally,
this legislation clarifies legal authority for local and state law enforcement
to honor federal immigration detainer requests by deeming officers who comply
to be acting as federal agents. It protects law enforcement by shielding
officers and jurisdictions from liability when they cooperate with federal
immigration enforcement. The bill also encourages compliance with federal
immigration law by targeting jurisdictions that defy lawful detainer requests
and shield illegal immigrants from removal.
Cities and
states are also willing to pay dearly for the cost of allowing illegal aliens
in their locations. The cost of feeding and boarding them can be enormous;
educating their children, many who don’t speak English, is significant. They
are also putting ICE officers in danger by alerting protestors that the
officers will be working in their areas.
States
and local governments have already demonstrated that they are more concerned
with protecting illegal aliens than protecting their cities. But the federal
government is no longer sitting back and allowing this violation of the
law:
Today,
the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued a comprehensive list of
sanctuary jurisdictions including cities, counties, and states that are
deliberately obstructing the enforcement of federal immigration laws and
endangering American citizens. Sanctuary cities protect dangerous criminal
illegal aliens from facing consequences and put law enforcement in grave
danger. [snip] The order directs the Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem
and the Attorney General Pam Bondi to identify and publicly highlight
jurisdictions that refuse to cooperate with federal immigration authorities.
[snip]
Each
jurisdiction listed will receive formal notification of its non-compliance and
all potential violations of federal criminal statutes. DHS demands that these
jurisdictions immediately review and revise their policies to align with
federal immigration laws and renew their obligation to protect American
citizens, not dangerous illegal aliens.
Some
cities are pushing back on this effort to identify them:
Baltimore’s
Mayor Brandon Scott said on X that Baltimore is ‘not a sanctuary city,’
noting that Baltimore does not control the city’s jails. Jails are a key area
where ICE cooperates with local law enforcement authorities so it can be
notified when immigrants are going to be released.
But
Scott also said the city made no apologies for being a ‘welcoming city’ and
said it was preparing for litigation if needed to protect the city’s immigrant
community and the money it gets from the federal government.
‘We
are better because of our immigrant neighbors, and are not about to sell them
out to this administration,’ Scott said.
Mayor
Scott is manipulating the meaning of the law to his own benefit to protect the
illegal aliens, and hopefully he won’t be successful.
On
the other hand, Gov. Glenn
Youngkin has been clear about supporting the rule of law and taking action
against illegal aliens:
Glenn
Youngkin, Governor of Virginia, unveiled a budget proposal that would mandate
that local law enforcement fully comply with Immigration and Customs
Enforcement (ICE)) detainers and notify officials 48 hours before releasing an
undocumented immigrant who has committed a crime.
The
‘No Sanctuary Cities’ initiative would legally mandate full compliance with ICE
and proposes withholding funding from counties that purport to be
‘sanctuary’ cities or enact practices impeding cooperation with ICE.
[snip]
Youngkin
also threatened to cut state funding if counties obstruct ICE efforts or adopt
‘sanctuary city’ policies could face state funding cuts.
‘Virginia
is not a sanctuary state, and we must be clear that we will not allow
localities to become 'sanctuary cities.' If local governments turn their backs
on their citizens in order to pander to pro-illegal immigrant groups, we will
cut off their funding.’
Finally,
we have the Executive Branch and the Legislative Branch cooperating and united
in an effort to protect our borders, our national security, our citizens, and
the rule of law!