10/6/2017 - Arthur Schaper Townhall.com
Congress
has not repealed Obamacare. Can they succeed on tax reform? How about on
immigration? The House of Representatives passed meaningful immigration-based
legislation. From the U.S. Senate, David Perdue and Tom Cotton introduced the
RAISE Act to put American workers first and limit immigration. Then there’s the
SUCCEED Act from Sens. Thom Tillis, James Lankford, and Orrin Hatch. They are
pitching this “conservative” plan to help illegal youth previously sheltered by
DACA.
Tillis’s
bill stresses a much longer pathway to citizenship for the illegals. The DACA
recipients have to pay taxes, go to school or serve in the military. After ten
years they receive permanent legal status. After 15 years, they become
citizens.
Tillis and
Company have announced that the SUCCEED Act has bipartisan support. Really?
Let’s look
at some of these interested parties:
- The U.S. Chamber of Commerce: These guys are bipartisan in every way, since they have purchased lawmakers on both sides of the aisle--at the cost of American taxpayers. They want amnesty, open borders, and cheap labor, all of which hurt American sovereignty and workers.
- IBM: Another major corporation look for hi-tech skills at a low cost, again at the expense of Americans. IBM has more employees in India than in the United States. H-1B Abuse! Is it any surprise that many American youth are rejecting STEM career paths?
- Former Democratic Governor, presidential candidate, and DNC Chair Howard Dean. What a ringing endorsement. Yeeargh!
- Hispanic Leadership Fund President Mario H. Lopez. The Fund touts “Free trade,” which amounts to open borders, and they push the canard that our immigration system is broken.
- National Immigration Forum Executive Director Ali Noorani. His biggest interest? Helping “New Americans.” Check his website. (“New Americans” is another PC phrase for illegal aliens.)
- The LIBRE Initiative: The Koch Brothers are the main backers of this libertarian, Hispanic outreach program. They are part of the “right-wing open border conspiracy,” sharply criticized by Bernie Sanders of all people.
Just
because something is touted as “bipartisan” doesn’t mean that We the People
want it. In California, Cap and Trade, gas tax hikes, and forced vaccination
bills have passed with one or two votes from Republicans. Take your “bipartisan
support” and shove it. Notice also that the SUCCEED Act sponsors left out
immigration enforcement think-tanks. Jessica Vaughn of the Center for
Immigration Studies has criticized
the SUCCEED Act: “It is agreeing to an amnesty, without the U.S. gaining
anything. It’s not moderating immigration in any way.”
Vaughn’s
concern ties into the second problem with the SUCCEED Act: border security and
deterrence. Will this legislation prevent another wave of illegal alien youths
swarming our borders? Tillis tries to undercut this criticism: “The SUCCEED Act
includes proactive measures that will help deter illegal immigration, including
curtailing visa overstays, a major source of illegal immigration.” They want to
tackle VISA overstays, but the most lethal illegal immigration issues take
place at the border. We need the wall, tripled the border control and E-Verify!
There is nothing in this legislation to assure that those measures come first.
What about
chain migration? This bill targets the kids who are now all grown up. What
about the parents, cousins, aunts, and all the other family members twice
removed or related to the in-laws? The legislation will prevent chain
migration, sponsorship for the illegal kids waiting for legal status following
the conditional program. BUT … once the DACA kids go from conditional to legal
status to fully naturalized citizenship, they can sponsor families, loved ones.
Not good. After breaking the law as unauthorized migrants, they get away with
the crime, and then they can bring in the family. Any discussions about having
SUCCEED and RAISE together cannot work. Tillis’s bill naively
ignores rampant DACA fraud, too. One estimate suggests that 40 percent of
the DACA recipients shouldn’t have enrolled for the status to begin with. What
about the children of these DACA kids, who are legal residents? We have another
generation of “anchor babies,” and no action will be taken to remedy the abuses
of the 14th Amendment.
But the
SUCCEED Act proposal will create jobs, right? Tillis cites the Niskanen Center
analysis of the SUCCEED Act: 117,000 new jobs, increased GDP by $81 billion,
with a total federal revenue income of $22 billion over ten years. Of course,
Amnesty Tom doesn’t mention the costs—and they will be considerable. By the
way, the Niskansen center invests its resources in promoting environmentalism,
immigration reform, and civil rights through libertarian principles. Huh?
And what
about opinions from other immigration enforcement activists and groups?
Agnes Gibboney,
the head of Parents of Murdered Children (her son Ronald de Silva was murdered
by an illegal alien), seemed receptive to the legislation, until she learned
that the DACA kids can sponsor their parents once they achieve citizenship: “I
don't like that. In that case say NO to SUCCEED ACT and DACA.”
Robin
Hvidston, Executive Director for We the People Rising slammed the senators’
attention to foreign nationals instead of American citizens: “Where is the US
Foster Care SUCCEED Act? There are more than 600,000 veterans at this moment in
need of medical care. Where is their SUCCEED Act?”
Finally,
Tim Lyng of The Remembrance Project shared: “Americans must be placed first.
Congress has not made an effort to assist American families who have been
injured or whose loved ones were killed.”
By the way,
the SUCCEED Act is not a conservative solution, since conservatism advocates
for the rule of law, legal equity, national sovereignty, and protection of
individual liberty and prosperity of citizens, free from the intervention of
special interests from the state. I had an open mind, but not for an open
borders proposal. The SUCCEED Act is another immigration “reform” failure. The
U.S. senators would be better off doing nothing on immigration, and just allow
the Executive Branch continue to enforce our immigration laws.
No comments:
Post a Comment