4/13/2018 - Ed Feulner Townhall.com
In a saner age, adding
a question about an individual’s citizenship status to the decennial U.S.
Census would be the most unremarkable thing in the world. The only
understandable reaction might be, “What took you so long?”
But no. We live in a
hyper-partisan, politically correct era, so the Trump administration’s decision
to add the citizenship question has been met with howls of shock and horror. A
coalition of Democratic cities and states is suing the administration, claiming
the decision violates federal law.
“Galling,” pronounced The
New York Times in an editorial titled “The Trump Administration
Sabotages The Census.” Along with many other critics, the Times
insists that the question will lead to a vast undercounting of the immigrant
population.
Such a prospect alarms
opponents such as the editors at The Washington Post, who at least admit
their concern is more about political power: “Whether by design or
incompetence, the Trump administration is threatening to rig the count against
Democrats.”
Or maybe – just maybe –
the administration is trying to get a better handle on how many non-citizens we
have in our country. Sure, you can’t expect 100 percent accuracy, but as the
administration noted, the question can be answered anonymously. So why not ask?
Besides, there is
nothing new about adding a citizenship question to the U.S. Census. Indeed, the
first one was asked almost 200 years ago, in the 1820 Census, after being
proposed by our third president, Thomas Jefferson.
“The question was
included in censuses, continuously and without controversy, from 1890-1950, a
period which encompassed the years of highest immigration and the highest
percentage of foreign-born citizens in American history,” notes author Mike
Gonzalez. “It was asked on the long-form census until 2000 and continues to be
asked today on the American Community Survey.”
In fact, the
citizenship question to be included on the 2020 Census is the same one already
asked yearly on the American Community Survey.
But no. It wasn’t until
the Trump administration -- which is so roundly despised by the Left that none
of its proposals are actually considered on its merits – decided to put the
question on the Census itself that it became a problem.
How big a problem?
According to House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), it would “inject
fear and distrust into vulnerable communities, and cause traditionally
undercounted communities to be even further underrepresented, financially
excluded, and left behind.”
Ironically, though,
it’s the policies of the Left, not the Right, which are doing that. Liberals
are the ones who encourage the identity politics that divide our nation so
needlessly. As Justice Clarence Thomas said in the 1994 Supreme Court case Holder
v. Hall:
“We have involved the
federal courts, and indeed the nation, in the enterprise of systematically
dividing the country into electoral districts along racial lines — an
enterprise of segregating the races into political homelands that amounts, in
truth, to nothing short of a system of ‘political apartheid.’ Blacks are drawn
into ‘black districts’ and given ‘black representatives’; Hispanics are drawn
into Hispanic districts and given ‘Hispanic representatives’; and so on.”
And isn’t it
interesting that the same critics who bang the drums daily about “foreign
interference” in our elections should suddenly show absolutely no concern about
discovering the extent of illegal immigration in our country? As J. Christian
Adams, president of the Public Interest Legal Foundation and a former Justice
Department lawyer, said in a public statement:
“It’s critical that the
next redistricting cycle account for the citizen residents of districts so
urban centers do not unfairly profit from the political subsidy that higher
non-citizen populations provide. This carries the nation one step closer to
preventing against actual foreign influences in our elections.”
If we want to diminish
those influences, and get a better handle on the size of our alien population,
asking the immigration question on the Census is a good place to start.
No comments:
Post a Comment