May 31, 2018 Victor Davis Hanson · Patriotpost.us
After a landslide loss
in the 1972 presidential election, the Democratic Party was resuscitated the
following year by the Watergate scandal. The destruction of the Nixon
presidency powered the Democrats to make huge political gains in the 1974
elections.
Watergate also birthed
(or perhaps rebirthed) modern investigative journalism. A young generation of
maverick reporters supposedly alone had challenged the establishment in order
to uncover the whole truth about abuses of power by the Nixon administration.
Liberalism rode high
during the Watergate era. It had demanded that civil liberties be protected
from the illegal or unconstitutional overreach of the Nixon-era FBI, CIA and
other agencies. Liberals alleged that out-of-control officials had spied on
U.S. citizens for political purposes and then tried to mask their wrongdoing
under the cover of “national security” or institutional “professionalism.”
All those legacies are
now eroding. The Democratic Party, the investigative media and liberalism
itself are now weirdly on the side of the reactionary administrative state.
They have either downplayed or excused Watergate-like abuses of power by the
former Barack Obama administration.
Liberal journalists
apparently have few concerns that the FBI apparently used at least one secret
informant to gather information about the 2016 Trump campaign. Nor are they much
bothered that members of the Obama national security team unmasked the names of
U.S. citizens who had been improperly surveilled. Many of those names then were
illegally leaked to the press.
Democrats seem
indifferent to the fact that Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign paid a
foreign agent, Christopher Steele, to compile dirt on Republican candidate
Donald Trump — largely by trafficking in unverified rumors from Russian
interests. Obama administration officials leaked details from that dossier.
Civil libertarians
appear unconcerned that the Department of Justice sought to deceive the Foreign
Intelligence Surveillance Court, getting it to grant warrants to allow the
surveillance of U.S. citizens based on the suspect and politically motivated
Steele dossier.
Few are upset that
former CIA Director John Brennan and former Director of National Intelligence
James Clapper have lied under oath to Congress on matters pertaining to
surveillance. Rather than being investigated by the media, both are now making frequent
media appearances.
The FBI cannot remain
credible when its former director, James Comey, leaks confidential memos about
meetings with the president to the media — with the expressed intent of
leveraging the appointment of a special counsel, Robert Mueller, who turned out
to be a longtime friend of Comey’s.
Why have the former
guardians of civil liberties flipped in the near half-century since Watergate?
One, both the media and
the liberal establishment believed that the outsider Trump represented an
existential danger to themselves and the nation at large — similar to the way
operatives in the Nixon administration had felt about far-left presidential
challenger George McGovern in 1972.
But this time around,
liberals were not out of power as they were in 1972. Instead, they were the
establishment. They held the reins of federal power under the Obama
administration. And they chose to exercise it in a fashion similar to how
Nixon’s team had in 1972.
Second, pollsters and
the media were convinced that Hillary Clinton would be elected. As a result,
members of the FBI, CIA and other federal bureaucracies apparently assumed that
any extralegal efforts to stop the common menace Trump would be appreciated
rather than punished by a soon-to-be President Clinton.
Three, those in the
Obama administration, the Clinton campaign and the media formed an echo
chamber. All convinced themselves that any means necessary to achieve the noble
ends of precluding a Trump presidency were justified.
The danger of such
groupthink continues; even now they are unaware of the impending bomb that is
about to go off.
Public opinion has
radically changed. A majority of Americans believe the Meuller investigation is
politically motivated, according to a CBS News poll.
The inspector general’s
report on the FBI’s handling of the Clinton email scandal is soon due. It will
likely detail violations of ethics and laws among Obama administration
officials and may include criminal referrals.
Already, a few liberals
and former Clinton supporters are warning the Left that it is on the wrong side
of history and about to reverse the entire post-Watergate liberal tradition.
There is a reckoning on
the horizon. It has nothing to do with Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton.
Instead, the traditional, self-appointed watchdogs of government overreach have
turned into the carnivores of civil liberties.
No comments:
Post a Comment