'Selective Law Enforcement' has and will continue to make 'Law Enforcement' insignificant. Law Enforcement must be allowed to use its tools.

 

Trump vs. Collins: Vehicle stops resume as an effective measure in fighting illegal immigration

Collins, a moderate Republican Senator, asked DHS to halt traffic stops after a series of deadly shootings, but Trump ordered that the stops continue.

By Amanda Head July 15, 2026 justthenews.com

On Wednesday, President Donald Trump put an end to a brief cessation of traffic stops intended to identify and process illegal migrants in Maine, after the Pine Tree States' senior senator, Republican Susan Collins, urged the policing measure to be halted.

On Tuesday night, following a fatal shooting in Biddeford, Maine, during one such traffic stop, Collins reportedly called Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Markwayne Mullin and explicitly urged him to cease all non-urgent vehicle stops nationwide.

DHS, under Mullin's direction, then implemented the temporary pause, but in an executive flex, Trump overruled it within 24 hours. 

The move is classic Trump—exercising unusually tight personal oversight of his administration’s ambitious mass deportation initiative, signaling that even seemingly-minor immigration enforcement decisions will flow directly from the White House rather than career officials at DHS or ICE.

By repeatedly intervening to maintain aggressive tactics and rejecting pauses urged by agency leaders, Trump has made it abundantly clear that operational tempo will not bend to bureaucratic caution or short-term controversies. It's a classic, hands-on approach that shows his determination to deliver on his campaign promises at scale, treating interior enforcement as a personal priority immune to internal resistance.

Terry v. Ohio in full effect 

Despite detractors' criticism of the practice, it's constitutional, established in 1968 by the U.S. Supreme Courts' decision in Terry v. Ohio. 

That landmark Supreme Court case allows police (or federal agents) to briefly detain and investigate a person based on “reasonable suspicion” of criminal activity—less than the probable cause needed for an arrest—without violating the Fourth Amendment.

Importantly, the case underpins the legal authority for agents to pull over vehicles when they have specific, articulable facts suggesting immigration violations or related crimes, rather than random stops. The ruling also permits limited frisks for officer safety.

Broken-window policing is provably effective  

One practical application of the protections and allowances that transpired from Terry v. Ohio is "broken windows policing," a theory introduced by James Q. Wilson and George Kelling in 1982. 

It argues that visible signs of disorder—such as broken windows, graffiti, loitering, or minor offenses—signal a lack of social control and invite more serious crime, and that visible signs of disorder (graffiti, litter, or broken windows) encourage further crime and antisocial behavior. Put simply, under the theory, people who commit "petty" crimes are much likelier to also commit serious — and sometimes deadly — felonies.

The strategy focuses on aggressively enforcing low-level violations to restore order and prevent escalation. It was famously implemented in New York City in the 1990s under Mayor Rudy Giuliani and Police Commissioner William Bratton, with zero-tolerance policies targeting subway fare evasion, public drinking and vandalism.

NYC saw a dramatic crime drop. Homicides fell over 70% from 1990 to 2000 and overall crime declined sharply. Proponents credit the approach with reclaiming neighborhoods, especially those that, at the time, had some of the highest crime rates in the country.

Amanda Head is White House Correspondent at Just The News. You can follow her here.