By Allan Wall 07/09/12 VDARE
I think we would all agree that the U.S. faces many problems today. Our
national
debt [1] is enormous, about the size of our Gross
National Product [2]. We have a high unemployment rate and growing gap
between rich and poor. We have many social problems, including crime and family
disintegration [3]. We have a high abortion rate, and a movement
afoot [4] to completely redefine the institution of marriage. We have
environmental problems and our education system is in crisis. Racial
and ethnic [5] strife are growing, and in general, our shared links as a
nation are fraying.
There are many movements working to improve and/or restore elements of
American greatness. Environmentalists say we need to protect the environment
[6], education reformers say we need to reform the schools. Social
conservatives uphold moral values. Libertarians
[7] say we need limited government. Constitutionalists say we need to follow
the Constitution.
I would actually agree, in principal, with all these movements. But with so
many causes, where do we begin? There is one factor that is related to all
these problems. And this is the one factor our leaders don’t really want us to
debate. What’s that factor?
DEMOGRAPHY.
America is being drastically
transformed [8]. Our white, Anglo-European majority, the historical
American majority, the people who formed this country, is being reduced
to a minority [9]. It hasn’t happened yet, but if present trends continue,
by about 2050, whites are going to be a minority.
Just recently the Census Bureau announced that the total of minority babies
has surpassed the total of white babies. So the demographic transformation is
well underway. It’s rather astonishing how fast it’s occurred, and how little
has been said about it.
As a nation and a people, Americans
NEVER voted on this [10]. It was never publicly debated in any meaningful
fashion. Yet now it’s being foisted upon us and we’re told it’s inevitable.
Mind you, it is permissible to discuss the transformation—as long as
you think it is a good thing. But you can get in big trouble for saying it is
bad, or even questioning it. Pat Buchanan was
kicked off the MSNBC network [11] in February for doing so. The network
head, Phil
Griffin, [12] didn’t think Buchanan’s book, Suicide of a Superpower [13], which discusses the
transformation [14], “should be part of the national dialogue...”
Incredibly, to question this extraordinary and unprecedented transformation
is thus taboo in the “land of the free
and the home of the brave”. [15] The Republican Party´s
“Conservatism Inc.” [16] elitists and even many immigration
patriots don´t want to question [17] the transformation either.
In 1960, the U.S.
was 89% white, 10% black and 1% other. The 1965
Immigration Act [18] began the process of changing that, despite the fact
that one of its sponsors, a young Senator Ted Kennedy, assured
[19] the nation that “the ethnic mix of this country will not be upset…” Of
course, there have been other factors involved.
“Diversity” is now held up as our highest ideal—even higher than our Constitution
and American traditions. A legacy of the Civil Rights era [20] is a
powerful narrative of white oppressors and nonwhite victims which became the
lens through which to view race relations in general. Our young people have
been raised on that.
Then there was the establishment of the “Hispanic”
ethnic category, [21] which encourages even white
Hispanics [22] to identify
as “Hispanics” [23] and not as whites.
The demographic transformation of our country continues rapidly. There are
still large
areas of our country which are recognizably American. [24] But it doesn’t
take long, especially with the power of the cheap labor lobby, to inundate
these areas with foreigners. Of course, any friction between foreigners and
natives is chalked up to white racism.
So does this massive demographic transformation even matter? So what if
whites become a minority? It will still be the U.S.A., right? That’s what the
Conservatism Inc. elitists want you to believe. They say they are “color
blind”. But if they are truly “color blind”, why aren’t they resisting affirmative
action, [25] race norming and disparate
impact [26] policies, all of which discriminate against white people.
I guess to be “color blind” doesn’t include defending white
people from discrimination. [27]
What will a post-2050 America
look like? Will it be a better place to live? Will any of the problems listed
at the beginning of the article be improved by making whites a minority? Is the demographic transformation going to
prevent economic disaster? Is it going to prevent our government from spending
(and borrowing) more money? Is it going to prevent the diminution of the middle
class?
All the evidence indicates the opposite. The growth of the nonwhite
population is increasing the size
of the welfare state [28] and makes it more difficult to decrease it.
Family values? Hispanic women have both higher out-of-wedlock birth rates
and higher abortion rates than white women! Is this likely to get better as Hispanic
population growth continues to increase so rapidly?
Gay
marriage? [29] It’s more likely to be supported by Democratic politicians
than Republicans, and the growing
minority population [30] increases the rolls
of the Democratic Party. [31]. As for the environment, do you think the demographic
transformation [32] is going to stop
urban sprawl? [33]
Our growing diversity is causing all sorts
of problems in the educational system [34]. Our own Steve Sailer [35], in some
groundbreaking journalism you won’t see in the Mainstream Media, has
shown how [36] American educational
statistics [37] are affected by diversity.
Furthermore, the loss
of the white majority [38] is not only going to affect relations between
whites and minorities. There is already friction
between nonwhite minorities. [39] How will things be without the white
majority to hold the country together? As for limited government, minorities in
general don’t really go for it [40]. Big Government means more government
benefits for minorities.
Do we need to get back to the Constitution? Of course we do. But the
Constitution is a product of our culture, designed for our culture. It may not
work for every culture, and most likely won’t work for an amalgam of competing
cultures in post-2050
America. [41]. We have to face reality. We can’t stick our heads in the
sand. The demographic change means the massive transformation of our society.
Of course the Democrats support it. Why wouldn’t they? Democratic leaders
see minorities as more votes. That’s why they like mass immigration—of both the
legal and illegal varieties, really just two sides of the same coin.
Prominent Democrats are fully aware of how demography helps them. Hispanic
labor activist Eliseo
Medina [42] has boasted about how amnesty will bring in millions of liberal
voters and former president
Bill Clinton [43], in his own picturesque way, has bragged
[44] about how the demographic change hurts the ability of Republicans to
oppose Democrats.
What about Republican leaders? Why do they support mass immigration and
demographic change? Don’t they realize it will swamp the Republican Party? Have
they not noticed solid
Republican states [45] moving over to the Democratic column? Why do they think
pandering to Hispanics [46] will make up for the demographic tidal wave?
Maybe it´s too late to save the Republican Party. But if Hispanics and
other minorities won’t vote for the pusillanimous Republican Party, they are
even less likely
to vote [47] for the Constitution
Party [48] or the Libertarian
Party [49] or any party or candidate favoring limited government. Third
Party activists who
think they can get the minority vote [50] are living in a real fantasy
land.
So what can be done? Is
there no hope?
Not as long as we let the Multicultural, Cultural
Marxist [51] Left set the agenda, and determine the way people think. The
first step is to shake off the intellectual yoke of the Left.
Our Main Stream Media and educational system have indoctrinated nonwhites
to be very race-conscious—but white people are never to think of themselves as
white. We constantly hear about the “Latino Vote” and the “Black Vote”, etc.,
but to even bring up the “White Vote” is to risk ostracism—even if, in the case
of the GOP, it would be beneficial to your political party.
Why not bring that fact up, into the Mainstream Dialogue? If whites can’t
appeal to racial and ethnic interests, than nobody can. But if minorities can
openly appeal to such interests, why can´t American whites?
When we hear the paeans to post-2050 America, let’s ask: “Hey, when did
we vote for this? How about a national referendum to vote on it?” It at least
might get people thinking.
When they prattle on about the Hispanic vote, let’s ask: “Hey, do Hispanic
voters have different
interests [52] than non-Hispanic Americans?” We should ask Hispanic
activists [52] themselves this question. When they use
the Hispanic vote to stampede us into supporting an amnesty [53], ask: “Why
should Hispanics alone have veto power over U.S. immigration policy?”
The demographic transformation is still not inevitable. But for those who
believe it is, ask why whites
should be discriminated against [54] if they are just going to be another
minority?
It’s high time to ask these and similar questions in public, so that even
our candidates [55] can’t ignore them. And we do need to wake up the
average American voter. Too many Americans are just not paying attention. As
long as their own lives are comfortable, they don’t care about the demographic
transformation that’s going to shape the lives of their children
and grandchildren. [56]
It is time to wake them
up.
It is time to ask the
tough questions.
It is time to face
reality and deal with it.
No comments:
Post a Comment