by Phyllis Schlafly Eagle Forum October 29, 2014
Control of the U.S. Senate is up for grabs on November 4, and illegal
voters may tip the balance. Estimates are that more than 14 percent of
non-citizens were registered to vote in the elections of 2008 and 2010, and
that could now easily exceed the margin of victory in many tight Senate races.
Democrats typically win more than 80 percent
of the votes cast by non-citizens, so votes cast by non-citizens produce a net
bonanza of additional votes for Democrats. Democrat Al Franken won a Republican
U.S. Senate seat in Minnesota by a margin of only 312 votes in 2008, and with
the immense power of incumbency he is expected to cruise to reelection this
time.
New non-partisan research by professors at Old
Dominion University uncovered the shocking amount of voting by non-citizens, as
published by the Washington Post last Friday. Their work did not choose sides
in the debate over whether non-citizens should be allowed to vote, which
Congress has already answered in the negative by sensibly limiting voting in
federal elections to only American citizens.
This study concluded that voter ID alone will
not eliminate voting by non-citizens, because voter ID does not require proof
of citizenship, such as a passport or birth certificate. But that loophole is
easily closed by requiring proof of citizenship to register to vote, just as one
must show proof of citizenship in order to obtain a passport.
Several states enacted common-sense provisions
in order to strengthen voter integrity in this year’s election. The U.S.
Supreme Court denied an attempt to block voter ID from going into effect in
Texas, so at least the Lone Star State will be able to limit mischief at their
polls in this election.
Other states are not so fortunate. Wisconsin
passed a voter ID law that was upheld by the Seventh Circuit, but the U.S.
Supreme Court then blocked that good law from going into effect this November.
In July, three non-citizens were indicted for
illegal voting in Ohio in the 2012 presidential election. But most illegal
voting cases end in a plea bargain that results in erasure of the convictions
after a year if the defendant stays out of additional trouble for that long.
In Colorado, which could decide which party
controls the U.S. Senate, votes are now cast entirely by mail with little
protection against voter fraud. A total of 3.6 million ballots were sent to
Coloradans based on addresses as old as 2008, which is six years ago.
One Colorado state senator said he has been to
households that have received as many as seven separate ballots, and the person
now living there could vote all seven ballots without anyone noticing. Paid
political activists, known as “harvesters,” can gather up to ten ballots of
others and then dump them all in an unguarded drop box, and there is nothing
that stops harvesters from gathering and voting even more.
What happens to unused ballots that people
throw out after receiving them in the mail? Most people do not shred their
trash, so many unused ballots inevitably end up in apartment complex garbage
bins where they are available to be filled in and sent in by unscrupulous party
workers.
The lack of voting integrity makes it far from
clear whether the election outcome will reflect the will of the voters. The
essential role played by poll watchers is impossible in Colorado’s system of
mail-only balloting.
The corrupt practice of counting votes that
were cast in the names of dead people reemerged in North Carolina in 2012. The
executive director of that state’s election board reported that the votes of 81
dead people were counted, most of whom had died before it was possible for them
to cast absentee ballots.
A shocking total of 35,570 voters in North
Carolina had the same last and first names and birth dates of voters who also
cast ballots in other states. Many hundreds of those voters even had the same
last four digits of their Social Security numbers as people having identical
names and birthdays who also voted in other states.
Reforms passed in North Carolina are not
effective in time to ensure voter integrity in this election, where there is a
close race for the U.S. Senate seat. No voter ID is yet in effect there.
The top priority of Obama’s Department of
Justice has been to oppose voter ID laws passed by various states. But Attorney
General Eric Holder has announced his resignation, and the Senate should not
confirm any successor who opposes state efforts to improve voter integrity.
No comments:
Post a Comment