11/14/2014 - David Limbaugh Townhall.com
If he were sure the American public
would support his unilateral action, he would not have hesitated to issue it
prior to the elections, but he knew it wouldn't. Even if many people agree with
the substance of his policy, which is hardly a foregone conclusion, he knows
they don't agree with his method of thwarting the Congress, the Constitution
and the rule of law.
But this defiant ideologue clearly
doesn't care. He not only is unapologetic about brazenly going forward with his
quasi-amnesty plan but also will do it with a spirit of moral indignation, an
attitude that he, in his sovereign power, is tired of waiting on those in the
coequal legislative branch to accede to his executive demands and to surrender
their will -- and that of the people they represent -- to him.
Fox News reports that President
Obama is planning to unveil, as early as Nov. 21, a 10-part plan for
overhauling U.S. immigration policy through executive action -- action that
would include suspending deportation for millions of people living in the
United States illegally.
White House press secretary Josh
Earnest denied that Obama had made a final decision on taking these unilateral
steps and said he will wait to announce his plans until after he returns to
Washington from his Asia-Pacific trip. But Americans are well aware of what it
means when Obama says he hasn't quite made up his mind, such as with his
"evolving" charade on same-sex marriage. Not having made up his mind
doesn't mean he remains undecided; it means that he doesn't believe it's quite
the right time to admit his decision to the American people and that he will do
so when it is most beneficial to him and his policy goals.
Based on preliminary reports about
Obama's impending executive order, it will seek to expand deferred action for
immigrants who came to the United States illegally as children and also for the
parents of U.S. citizens and legal permanent residents. The order involving
these parents alone could include as many as 4.5 million people, making them
free from deportation action. These people would receive work authorization in
this country, Social Security numbers and government-issued IDs.
As for the younger people included
in the order, it would expand on a previous illegal action Obama took in June
2012, after admitting he had no authority to act without Congress. At that
time, he announced he wouldn't deport immigrants who came to the U.S. illegally
as children, provided they entered before June 2007 and would be younger than
31 as of June 2012. With his planned order, he will look to expand that to
cover people who entered before they were 16 and amend the cutoff date from
June 2007 to Jan. 1, 2010. This would make an estimated 300,000 more people
eligible for deferred action.
I don't care how singularly
compassionate President Obama and his Democratic friends mistakenly believe
they are being; he has no right to take this action without congressional
approval. It is lawless and inexcusable. Democrats would be outraged if the
shoe were on the other foot. Lucky for them, Republicans, believing in the rule
of law, will not reciprocate with similarly outrageous usurpations of
congressional authority should they win the White House in 2016. Comparisons to
past GOP presidential executive orders are disingenuous, and Democrats know it.
Obama's proposed executive order is on a massive scale and would effect a
change to substantive law over an issue that Congress has not been silent on
but expressly rejected. It would affect millions of people who came here
illegally and denigrate the democratic rights of all Americans.
Republicans, for a welcome change,
don't plan on taking this sitting down. In an op-ed in Politico, Sen. Jeff
Sessions, R-Ala., said that Congress will try to prevent Obama from taking this
executive action by adding language that would expressly prohibit money from
being allocated to implement his order. "Congress," wrote Sessions,
"has the power of the purse. The President cannot spend a dime unless
Congress appropriates it." Sessions noted that similar prohibitions
prevented Obama from closing down the Guantanamo Bay prison camp.
Other conservative congressmen are
calling for a series of short-term bills (continuing resolutions) to fund the
government -- bills that would prevent a showdown and a government shutdown but
would preserve leverage for Republicans to stop Obama's policies. They would agree
to short-term funding resolutions until they take over the majority in the
Senate early next year and can take more permanent action. They believe they
can prohibit funding for implementing Obama's unlawful immigration order and
still keep the government running.
It is gratifying that Republicans
are thinking more creatively and planning on engaging Obama in a proactive
manner. This is a welcome change from their past practice of surrendering or
announcing inevitable defeat without a fight.
Obama's planned order is
unambiguously and inarguably out of line, and it is on the heels of a stinging
rebuke by the voters of his agenda. When he attempts to proceed despite these
things, members of Congress will be right to vigorously oppose him, and the
people will back them.
No comments:
Post a Comment