February
3, 2015 Eagle Forum
While New York launches a review of procedures used to
enroll illegal immigrant students, Washington, D.C. is straining under the
tremendous burden of educating such students. The influx of over 50,000
children and young adults across the nation’s southern border is taxing school
budgets across the nation. These students were unexpected and not included in
schools’ fiscal plans. Most need specialized English Language Learner programs
and are usually on free or reduced lunch programs, furthering schools’
financial challenges.
N.Y. Enrollment Policy Investigated
The 1982 Plyler v. Doe Supreme Court decision
guaranteed a public education for undocumented children. The New York Dept. of
Education and attorney general’s office have launched an investigation “to
determine whether districts violated federal law when delaying enrollment of
students.” But Nassau, Rockland, Suffolk, and Westchester County schools say
some illegal alien children haven’t been admitted to schools because the adults
attempting to enroll them have been unable to provide the required documents
that prove student residency or to show that they have the guardianship
necessary to enroll students. (Proof of guardianship is a safety measure to
protect children from being enrolled by those who do not have legal custody.)
There are more than 3,000 unaccompanied minors who came to the four counties in
2014, either because they had relatives there or because agencies found
sponsors for them. (New York Times, 10-22-14)
D.C. Faces $ Burden
Watchdog.org used 2012 data based on 4,065 illegal
immigrants in Washington, D.C. to estimate that it would cost $86 million to
educate illegal immigrants that year. Their data was provided by the Pew
Research Center’s Hispanic Trends Project and was determined using the per
student annual cost of $21,347.
But due to the recent influx of children, it will now cost
closer to $186 million each year to educate illegal immigrants in D.C,
according to the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR). There are
now many more undocumented students in the district and using the simple
multiplication method doesn’t account for the additional expense incurred
through English Language Learner programs and the use of programs that feed
impoverished students at school.
Who is Crossing?
As of the end of June, Customs and Border Patrol had already
apprehended 57,525 unaccompanied children in the first nine months of the
fiscal year. “That includes 49,933 from Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador.”
(FactCheck.org, 7-18-14) Some children from Mexico may be immediately deported
but those from Central America are often offered permanent refuge.
Those who would illegally cross borders have been encouraged
to attempt it because talk of amnesty measures has increased at a time when
economic conditions have worsened and crime has increased in Central America
and Mexico.
In June, CNS News reported, “Instead of discouraging the
wave of illegal child immigrants headed toward the U.S. border, major media
outlets in Central America are encouraging the phenomenon in recent news
coverage.” CNS listed specific news outlets in Guatemala, El Salvador, and
Honduras that promoted crossing the border illegally.
Although the American media has indicated it is young
children coming across the border, among the initial 1,000 Central American
minors housed at Lackland Air Force base in Texas, “about 80% of the minors
housed at the base are male and 83% are over age 14.” (CSNnews.com, 6-18-14)
There are also reports that some crossers have a gang affiliation and have
committed crimes.
Mainstream media outlets say that mostly “children” are
crossing the border. But a review of actual figures show that the greatest
number of crossers, by far, are teens, although the percentage of younger
children crossing has increased at a higher rate in the past year. According to
figures obtained using a Freedom of Information Act request:
In fiscal year 2013, nine-in-ten minors apprehended at the
border were teens.
This share has dropped as the number of younger children
making the dangerous trip has risen dramatically: [Yet] in the first eight
months of fiscal year 2014, 84% were teens. (PewResearch.org, 7-22-14)
National Implications
It has been determined that the Obama administration
expected the influx and government officials have admitted this. In January of
2014, Homeland Security and the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Office
issued a solicitation at FedBizOpps.gov, a website that advertises government
contract openings, for private contractors to provide transportation and
escorts for an estimated 65,000 immigrant children from the U.S.-Mexico border
to relocation facilities throughout the United States. Part of the
advertisement read:
Escort services include, but are not limited to, assisting
with: transferring physical custody of UAC [Unaccompanied Alien Children]
from Dept. of Homeland Security to Health and Human Services (HHS) care via
ground or air methods of transportation (charter or commercial carrier),
property inventory, providing juveniles with meals, drafting reports,
generating transport documents, maintaining/stocking daily supplies, providing
and issuing clothing as needed, coordinating with DHS and HHS staff. . .
.(TheBlaze.com, 6-20-14; FactCheck.org, 7-18-14)
There has been an unprecedented attempt to spread the
illegal immigrants throughout the U.S. Even small, rural towns have received
UACs. The influx of school-aged teens and children impacts schools in
unexpected places. “Nationally, FAIR estimates that it costs about $52 billion
to educate children who are in the U.S. illegally.” (HumanEvents.com, 12-3-14)
The expense of this influx is not limited to schools.
Additional costs include transporting the UACs from the border to communities
and social services provided to those who eventually sponsor them.
Why Not a Fence Instead?
In July, President Obama requested that Congress provide an
emergency fund of $3.7 billion dollars to resettle the newest illegal aliens in
the U.S. Dividing $3.7 billion by the estimated 50,000 border crossers who will
be allowed to stay equals almost $74,000 per individual illegal alien. None of
this money is destined for schools.
Progressives consider $74,000 per crosser in one year a
reasonable expenditure but balk at increased border control and building a
fence that would permanently take care of the problem. Illegal border crossings
cost American taxpayers by lowering the quality of the education children
receive; by taking American jobs; and by diminishing the security of the
nation. Yet, Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX), Rep. Steve King (R-IA), and others who
support building a fence are maligned by those who fail to understand the cost
of illegal immigration and the potential for terrorists to infiltrate along
with unaccompanied juveniles.
No comments:
Post a Comment