Phyllis Schafly Eagle
Forum 10-1-15 Townhall.com
It’s long overdue for Congress to stop the racket
of bringing pregnant women into this country to give birth, receive free
medical care, and then call their babies U.S. citizens entitled to all American
rights and privileges plus generous handouts. Between 300,000 and 400,000
babies are born to illegal aliens in the United States every year, at least 10
percent of all births.
We have tolerated an entire industry called “birth
tourism,” offering “birth packages” costing thousands of dollars, to import
pregnant women from all over the world, Korea to Turkey (12,000 U.S.-born
Turkish babies have been arranged since 2003). An electronic billboard in
Mexico, advertising the services of an American doctor, proclaims, “Do you want
to have your baby in the U.S.?”
The advantages of birthright citizenship are
immense. The babies get Medicaid (including birth costs), Temporary Assistance
to Needy Families, and food stamps. Obviously, the baby shares his goodies with
his family. As soon as the child becomes an adult, he can legalize his parents,
and bring into the U.S. a foreign-born spouse and any foreign-born siblings.
They all can then bring in their own extended families, a policy called chain
migration.
Rep. Steve King (R-IA) has stepped up to this
challenge and already has 27 co-sponsors for his bill, H.R. 140, to define
citizenship. It states that the “subject to the jurisdiction” phrase in the
Fourteenth Amendment means a baby born in the United States only if at least
one parent is a U.S. citizen, or a lawfully-admitted resident alien, or an alien
on active duty in the U.S. armed services.
Rep. King is not trying to amend the Constitution.
He is simply using the Fourteenth Amendment’s Section 5, which gives Congress
(not the judiciary, not the executive branch), the power to enforce the
citizenship clause.
In 1993, Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV) introduced similar
legislation. Bills to limit birthright citizenship to children of U.S. citizens
and of aliens who are legal residents have been introduced by other members of
Congress every year since.
The amnesty crowd tries to tell us that the
Fourteenth Amendment makes automatic citizens out of “all persons” born in the
United States, but they conveniently ignore the rest of the sentence. It’s not
enough to be “born” in the U.S.; you can claim citizenship only if you are
“subject to the jurisdiction thereof.”
The Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868,
overruled the Dred Scott decision wherein the U.S. Supreme
Court declared that African Americans could not be citizens. Those who support
court-made law should forever be reminded of Abraham Lincoln’s warning that if
we accept the supremacy of judges, “the people will have ceased to be their own
rulers, having to that extent practically resigned their government into the
hands of that eminent tribunal.”
The Fourteenth Amendment denied citizenship to
American Indians, even though they obviously were “born” in the U.S., because
they were “subject to the jurisdiction” of their tribal governments. Congress
did not grant citizenship to American Indians on reservations until 1924, 56
years later.
Babies born in the U.S. to illegal aliens are
clearly citizens of their mother’s country, so granting U.S. citizenship
creates the possibility of dual citizenship, which the United States does not
officially recognize. To become a U.S. citizen, immigrants are required by our
law not only to swear allegiance to the United States but also to absolutely
renounce any and all allegiance to the nation from which they came.
There is no ambiguity about the solemn oath that
all naturalized Americans must take. “I hereby declare, on oath, that I
absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any
foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty, of whom or which I have
heretofore been a subject or citizen . . . so help me God.”
Any naturalized U.S. citizen who claims dual
citizenship with his native country betrays his solemn oath. If anchor babies
have citizenship in their parents’ country, they should not have U.S.
citizenship. Terminating the anchor baby racket is very popular with the
American people. A 2011 Rasmussen poll found that 65 percent of likely voters
oppose the practice, while only 29 percent favor it.
No comments:
Post a Comment