For years, Republican candidates have been assured by their political consultants that amnesty is a runaway hit with the public. Then they always come in for a zinger of a surprise when the American people are finally able to express themselves on the subject. (Sometimes it seems as if political consultants are in the game only to make money.)
Washington has tried to sneak through three amnesties in the last
decade -- in 2006, 2007 and 2013. Each time, amnesty had the full support of
the media, the White House, leaders of both political parties, big campaign
donors and lobbyists.
And every time, as soon as the public got wind of what was
happening, the politicians scattered like roaches and the loudest amnesty
proponent in the room would suddenly be demanding "border security
first!" Couldn't Republicans spare themselves the embarrassment of having
to say they "learned their lesson" by learning the same lesson of the
last 17 guys to push amnesty?
The McCain-Kennedy amnesty passed the Senate in 2006, instantly
inspiring an outpouring of voter anger so virulent that it shut down the
congressional switchboards. Despite enormous opposition from voters, lame-duck
President Bush cockily told reporters, "I'll see you at the bill
signing" -- the first step to ushering in a Democratic Congress in the
upcoming midterm elections.
By contrast, House Majority Leader John Boehner told a group of
Republicans that he had "promised the president today that I wouldn't say
anything bad about this piece of s--- bill." Weeks later, the chief
sponsor of the POS bill, Sen. John McCain, voted for a fence with no hint of
amnesty.
A year later, when he was running for president, immigration was
the issue dominating the primaries. McCain told voters, "My friends, I
learned a lesson." What he had allegedly learned was: "We must secure
the border first. We need to do these other things, but the American people
want something done about the border."
McCain even cut macho campaign commercials of him walking by the
southern border, saying, "Build the dang fence!" Too little, too
late. McCain lost the dang election. Bush's loss was equally monumental: He
lost Congress by pushing amnesty.
Contrary to liberals' claim that they had finally won the hearts
and minds of the people in opposing the Iraq War, leading to the Democrats'
2006 sweep of Congress, a Washington Post/ABC News poll taken about a month
into Bush's incessant yammering about amnesty showed that more Americans
approved of Bush's handling of the Iraq War than approved of his handling of
immigration. In nearly every poll on Bush's handling of immigration that year,
about 60 percent of the public disapproved and only 25 percent approved.
After Bush's party was wiped out in the midterm elections, the
Democratic-controlled Congress seemed certain to pass amnesty. Bush still
wanted it. So did the Democrats. So did the media. So did the donors.
But there was one teensy problem: The public still hated the idea.
You know how people always say "you can't beat something with
nothing." When it comes to amnesty, "nothing" outpolls
"something" every time.
In early June of 2007, a Rasmussen poll found that support for
"no bill" beat support for the Senate immigration bill by 5-to-3. By
the end of the week, "no bill" was winning 2-to-1, with 53 percent
against amnesty and only 26 percent for it. Public opposition was so
vociferous, the Senate didn't even vote on the 2007 amnesty.
Then, a few years later, erstwhile tea party darling Sen. Marco
Rubio burst on the scene deciding he was going to be the one to enact amnesty!
Teaming up with everybody's favorite senator, Chuck Schumer, Rubio spent a full
year zealously pushing amnesty, which entailed his telling huge, whopping lies
about it.
He blanketed the airwaves, convinced Rush Limbaugh and Mark Levin
to support the bill, toured all the Sunday morning talk shows. It worked! The
Senate passed Rubio's amnesty bill. It was Rubio's only accomplishment in
Washington. But then, unfortunately for him, the public found out about it and,
once again, an amnesty bill died. (When will these so-called "voters"
stop with their infernal meddling?)
The next thing we knew, Rubio was swearing to attendees at the
March 2014 Conservative Political Action Conference that what "I've
learned is you can't even have a conversation" about "immigration
reform" until "future illegal immigration will be controlled,"
calling it "the single biggest lesson of the last two years." A few
months later, he told The Wall Street Journal that he wouldn't vote for his own
bill if it came up again.
One-time GOP star, New Jersey governor Chris Christie, was
suckered into supporting the Schumer-Rubio amnesty by a mere 20-minute
conversation with Schumer. Not content to support the intensely hated amnesty
bill, Christie also signed a bill granting illegal aliens in-state tuition.
But just before announcing his run for the presidency this year,
Christie claimed that he, too, had "learned" more about the issue. He
now claims he considers a path to citizenship "extreme" and accused
Hillary Clinton of "pandering" by supporting a path to citizenship.
I'd say Christie had to eat his own words on immigration, but that
would be a cheap shot.
As governor of Arkansas, Mike Huckabee denounced a bill to require
verification of citizenship before registering to vote or applying for public
benefits, saying it "inflames those who are racist and bigots."
(Voters LOVE being called bigots!)
He made the weird claim that companies like Toyota or Nestle might
refuse to invest in Arkansas if the bill became law, by sending the message
that, "If you don't look like us, talk like us and speak like us, we don't
want you." It might also send the message that we don't want foreigners
voting in our elections or collecting public services meant for Americans.
But whenever he runs for president, Huckabee becomes a born-again
Minuteman! His current presidential website denounces "the Washington
establishment" for trying to "reward illegal immigrants with amnesty
and citizenship," adding, "Without a secure border, nothing
matters."
Instead of having to keep apologizing for their positions on
immigration, maybe Republicans should stop listening to political consultants
who are paid by business lobbyists to dump millions of poverty-stricken,
low-wage workers on the country.
Out of nowhere, non-politician Donald Trump has shot to the top of
the polls by denouncing America's widely unpopular immigration policies. All
those high-priced campaign consultants are standing around scratching their
heads.
Americans can see they're being forced to subsidize people who are
being brought in only to outvote them, provide cheap labor and change our
culture. All the donor money in the world isn't going to help you, Republicans,
if the voters hate you.
No comments:
Post a Comment